These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2039849)

  • 1. Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: an analysis of 894 pretrial referrals.
    Warren JI; Fitch WL; Dietz PE; Rosenfeld BD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 2039849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
    Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre-trial evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Chauhan P; Dietz PE; Morris J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 15048857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 17389343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between criminal charges, diagnoses, and psycholegal opinions among federal pretrial defendants.
    Cochrane RE; Grisso T; Frederick RI
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(4):565-82. PubMed ID: 11568961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: an empirical analysis.
    Borum R; Grisso T
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(3):297-317. PubMed ID: 8889131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Stejskal W; Colwell LH; Morris J; Chauhan P; Dietz P
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The application of evaluation tools for criminal responsibility in forensic psychiatric expertise].
    Fu PX; Wang J; Shi TT; Hu JN; Zhu MX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 26(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 20707283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study of criminal defendants referred for multiple psychiatric examinations regarding their competency to stand trial.
    Bluestone H; Melella J; Baskin D
    J Forensic Sci; 1981 Apr; 26(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 7264586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychiatric aspects of criminal responsibility: insanity and mitigation.
    Burrows M; Reid WH
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2011 Nov; 17(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 22108401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined evaluations of competency to stand trial and mental state at the time of the offense: An overlooked methodological consideration?
    Kois L; Wellbeloved-Stone JM; Chauhan P; Warren JI
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):217-229. PubMed ID: 28182458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice.
    Rogers R; Johansson-Love J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):450-60. PubMed ID: 20018994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Criminal responsibility in schizophrenia with special attention to the mental state during the criminal act--a study based upon the activation-recurrence phenomenon].
    Higashi T
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(7):762-88. PubMed ID: 19827562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fitness and competency issues in Canadian criminal courts: elucidating the standards for mental health professionals.
    Whittemore KE; Ogloff JR
    Can J Psychiatry; 1994 May; 39(4):198-210. PubMed ID: 8044726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competency to stand trial and the seriousness of the charge.
    Buchanan A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 17185474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.