BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20399450)

  • 1. Fuhrman grade provides higher prognostic accuracy than nucleolar grade for papillary renal cell carcinoma.
    Klatte T; Anterasian C; Said JW; de Martino M; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
    J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2143-7. PubMed ID: 20399450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation of tumor grade and histologic characteristics with clinical outcome.
    Cornejo KM; Dong F; Zhou AG; Wu CL; Young RH; Braaten K; Sadow PM; Nielsen GP; Oliva E
    Hum Pathol; 2015 Oct; 46(10):1411-7. PubMed ID: 26297250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
    Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: Fuhrman grade provides higher prognostic accuracy than nucleolar grade for papillary renal cell carcinoma: T. Klatte, C. Anterasian, J. W. Said, M. de Martino, F. F. Kabbinavar, A. S. Belldegrun and A. J. Pantuck J Urol 2010; 183: 2143-2147.
    Delahunt B; Bethwaite PB; Miller RJ; Sika-Paotonu D; Srigley JR
    J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):356-7; author reply 357-8. PubMed ID: 21094961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
    Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma.
    Rioux-Leclercq N; Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Ficarra V; Cindolo L; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Zigeuner R; Mejean A; Patard JJ
    Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):868-74. PubMed ID: 17262800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
    Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critical analysis of a simplified Fuhrman grading scheme for prediction of cancer specific mortality in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma--Impact on prognosis.
    Becker A; Hickmann D; Hansen J; Meyer C; Rink M; Schmid M; Eichelberg C; Strini K; Chromecki T; Jesche J; Regier M; Randazzo M; Tilki D; Ahyai S; Dahlem R; Fisch M; Zigeuner R; Chun FK
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26520403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: the impact of tumor grade on outcome.
    Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Sukov WR; Thompson RH; Leibovich BC
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 22367296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic role of Fuhrman grade and vascular endothelial growth factor in pT1a clear cell carcinoma in partial nephrectomy specimens.
    Minardi D; Lucarini G; Mazzucchelli R; Milanese G; Natali D; Galosi AB; Montironi R; Biagini G; Muzzonigro G
    J Urol; 2005 Oct; 174(4 Pt 1):1208-12. PubMed ID: 16145371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic value of renal cell carcinoma nuclear grading: multivariate analysis of 333 cases.
    Ficarra V; Righetti R; Martignoni G; D'Amico A; Pilloni S; Rubilotta E; Malossini G; Mobilio G
    Urol Int; 2001; 67(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11490206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
    Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphometric index of adult renal cell carcinoma. Comparison with the Fuhrman grading system.
    Montironi R; Santinelli A; Pomante R; Mazzucchelli R; Colanzi P; Filho AL; Scarpelli M
    Virchows Arch; 2000 Jul; 437(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 10963384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Pathological prognostic indicators in renal cell carcinoma].
    Rey Rey J; León Ramírez D; López García S; Fernández Vázquez P; Benavente Delgado J; Ojea Calvo A
    Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 20223135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting disease specific survival after nephrectomy for papillary renal cell carcinoma.
    Klatte T; Remzi M; Zigeuner RE; Mannweiler S; Said JW; Kabbinavar FF; Haitel A; Waldert M; de Martino M; Marberger M; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
    J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 20478577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.