764 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20399889)
1. Characterizing and predicting carcinogenicity and mode of action using conventional and toxicogenomics methods.
Waters MD; Jackson M; Lea I
Mutat Res; 2010 Dec; 705(3):184-200. PubMed ID: 20399889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the expression profiles induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens in rat liver.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Stuart B; Wahle B; Bomann W; Ahr HJ
Mutat Res; 2005 Aug; 575(1-2):61-84. PubMed ID: 15890375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toxicogenomics and cancer risk assessment: a framework for key event analysis and dose-response assessment for nongenotoxic carcinogens.
Bercu JP; Jolly RA; Flagella KM; Baker TK; Romero P; Stevens JL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):369-81. PubMed ID: 20801182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of toxicogenomics to study mechanisms of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Aubrecht J; Kleinjans JC; Ahr HJ
Toxicol Lett; 2009 Apr; 186(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 18822359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. State-of-the-art genomics approaches in toxicology.
Van Hummelen P; Sasaki J
Mutat Res; 2010 Dec; 705(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 20466069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of a carcinogenic potential of rat hepatocarcinogens using toxicogenomics analysis of short-term in vivo studies.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Gmuender H; Bandenburg A; Ahr HJ
Mutat Res; 2008 Jan; 637(1-2):23-39. PubMed ID: 17689568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of predictive models for nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity using both toxicogenomics and quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Liu Z; Kelly R; Fang H; Ding D; Tong W
Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 24(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 21627106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toxicogenomics applied to in vitro carcinogenicity testing with Balb/c 3T3 cells revealed a gene signature predictive of chemical carcinogens.
Rohrbeck A; Salinas G; Maaser K; Linge J; Salovaara S; Corvi R; Borlak J
Toxicol Sci; 2010 Nov; 118(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 20713471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active cell death (apoptosis) and cellular proliferation as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
Schulte-Hermann R; Bursch W; Marian B; Grasl-Kraupp B
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):273-85. PubMed ID: 10353391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cancer risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate: application of the new U.S. EPA Risk Assessment Guidelines.
Doull J; Cattley R; Elcombe C; Lake BG; Swenberg J; Wilkinson C; Williams G; van Gemert M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Jun; 29(3):327-57. PubMed ID: 10388618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and evaluation of a genomic signature for the prediction and mechanistic assessment of nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens in the rat.
Fielden MR; Adai A; Dunn RT; Olaharski A; Searfoss G; Sina J; Aubrecht J; Boitier E; Nioi P; Auerbach S; Jacobson-Kram D; Raghavan N; Yang Y; Kincaid A; Sherlock J; Chen SJ; Car B;
Toxicol Sci; 2011 Nov; 124(1):54-74. PubMed ID: 21813463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genotoxicity of 1,3-butadiene and its epoxy intermediates.
Walker VE; Walker DM; Meng Q; McDonald JD; Scott BR; Seilkop SK; Claffey DJ; Upton PB; Powley MW; Swenberg JA; Henderson RF;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Aug; (144):3-79. PubMed ID: 20017413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A strategy for establishing mode of action of chemical carcinogens as a guide for approaches to risk assessments.
Butterworth BE; Conolly RB; Morgan KT
Cancer Lett; 1995 Jun; 93(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 7600540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of specific mRNA signatures as fingerprints for carcinogenesis in mice induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens.
Kossler N; Matheis KA; Ostenfeldt N; Bach Toft D; Dhalluin S; Deschl U; Kalkuhl A
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Feb; 143(2):277-95. PubMed ID: 25410580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive toxicogenomics approaches reveal underlying molecular mechanisms of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity.
Nie AY; McMillian M; Parker JB; Leone A; Bryant S; Yieh L; Bittner A; Nelson J; Carmen A; Wan J; Lord PG
Mol Carcinog; 2006 Dec; 45(12):914-33. PubMed ID: 16921489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
