These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20400627)

  • 1. Place learning by mechanical contact.
    Harrison SJ; Turvey MT
    J Exp Biol; 2010 May; 213(Pt 9):1436-42. PubMed ID: 20400627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of crawling and walking experience in infant spatial memory.
    Clearfield MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Nov; 89(3):214-41. PubMed ID: 15501452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM; Brown MF
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19777275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual homing in the absence of feature-based landmark information.
    Gillner S; Weiss AM; Mallot HA
    Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 18804202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning of absolute and relative distance and direction from discrete visual landmarks by pigeons (Columba livia).
    Sturz BR; Katz JS
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Feb; 123(1):90-113. PubMed ID: 19236148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts.
    Foo P; Warren WH; Duchon A; Tarr MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 15755239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landmark-based search memory in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris).
    Fiset S
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Nov; 121(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 18085917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for averaging of distance from landmarks in the domestic dog.
    Fiset S
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jul; 81(3):429-38. PubMed ID: 19520243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different memory types for generating saccades at different stages of learning.
    Horaguchi T; Sugino K
    Neurosci Res; 2006 Jul; 55(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 16720055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visuospatial working memory and the processing of spatial descriptions.
    Deyzac E; Logie RH; Denis M
    Br J Psychol; 2006 May; 97(Pt 2):217-43. PubMed ID: 16613650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. For humans navigating without vision, navigation depends upon the layout of mechanically contacted ground surfaces.
    Harrison SJ; Bonnette S; Malone M
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Apr; 238(4):917-930. PubMed ID: 32172353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual landmark orientation by flying bats at a large-scale touch and walk screen for bats, birds and rodents.
    Winter Y; von Merten S; Kleindienst HU
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Feb; 141(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 15661311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selforganizing memory: active learning of landmarks used for navigation.
    Cruse H; Hübner D
    Biol Cybern; 2008 Sep; 99(3):219-36. PubMed ID: 18797951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competition between landmarks in spatial learning: the role of proximity to the goal.
    Chamizo VD; Manteiga RD; Rodrigo T; Mackintosh NJ
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jan; 71(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16338101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do landmarks help or hinder women in route learning?
    Gwinn HM; Fernando S; James S; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):713-8. PubMed ID: 12509164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning your way around town: how virtual taxicab drivers learn to use both layout and landmark information.
    Newman EL; Caplan JB; Kirschen MP; Korolev IO; Sekuler R; Kahana MJ
    Cognition; 2007 Aug; 104(2):231-53. PubMed ID: 16879816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark.
    Wilson PN; Alexander T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 18980401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Global and local spatial landmarks: their role during foraging by Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus).
    Vlasak AN
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Jan; 9(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16163480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies in landmark use by orangutans and human children.
    Marsh HL; Spetch ML; MacDonald SE
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jul; 14(4):487-502. PubMed ID: 21312049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A room with a view and a polarizing cue: individual differences in the stimulus control of place navigation and passive latent learning in the water maze.
    Devan BD; Petri HL; Mishkin M; Stouffer EM; Bowker JL; Yin PB; Buffalari DM; Olds JL
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2002 Jul; 78(1):79-99. PubMed ID: 12071669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.