These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Behavioral research in pigeons with ARENA: an automated remote environmental navigation apparatus. Leising KJ; Garlick D; Parenteau M; Blaisdell AP Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 19429204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A molecular dissociation between cued and contextual appetitive learning. Kheirbek MA; Beeler JA; Chi W; Ishikawa Y; Zhuang X Learn Mem; 2010 Mar; 17(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 20189959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice, time and food: continuous cyclical changes in food probability between reinforcers. Miranda-Dukoski L; Davison M; Elliffe D J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):406-21. PubMed ID: 24615528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures. Cooper LD; Aronson L; Balsam PD; Gibbon J J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 2303790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude. Allan RW; Zeigler HP J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 7964365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociation of Pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists. Dickinson A; Smith J; Mirenowicz J Behav Neurosci; 2000 Jun; 114(3):468-83. PubMed ID: 10883798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning. Harris JA; Andrew BJ; Kwok DW J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23421397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reward magnitude and timing in pigeons. Ludvig EA; Balci F; Spetch ML Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 21244854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of discrimination training on responding during a compound conditioned stimulus. Pearce JM; Adam J; Wilson PN; Darby RJ J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Oct; 18(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 1402694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace. Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Competition between stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and anticipatory contrast. Williams BA J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 1402603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]