These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20400731)

  • 1. Response variability in pigeons in a Pavlovian task.
    Stahlman WD; Young ME; Blaisdell AP
    Learn Behav; 2010 May; 38(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 20400731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of reward probability on spatial and temporal variation.
    Stahlman WD; Roberts S; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 20141319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spontaneous recovery varies inversely with the training-extinction interval.
    Rescorla RA
    Learn Behav; 2004 Nov; 32(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 15825882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Associative influence on the foraging behavior of pigeons (Columba livia).
    Rashotte ME; O'Connell JM; Beidler DL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1982 Apr; 8(2):142-53. PubMed ID: 7069376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pigeons' discrimination of Michotte's launching effect.
    Young ME; Beckmann JS; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 17002229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resistance to change within heterogeneous response sequences.
    Reid AK
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):293-311. PubMed ID: 19594277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response factors in delay discounting: evidence for Pavlovian influences on delay discounting in pigeons.
    Holt DD; Carlson JD; Follett VL; Jerdee NJ; Kelley DP; Muhich KM; Tiry AM; Reetz NK
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():37-43. PubMed ID: 23618788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid contextual conditioning in autoshaping.
    Balsam PD; Schwartz AL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 7288369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral research in pigeons with ARENA: an automated remote environmental navigation apparatus.
    Leising KJ; Garlick D; Parenteau M; Blaisdell AP
    Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 19429204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A molecular dissociation between cued and contextual appetitive learning.
    Kheirbek MA; Beeler JA; Chi W; Ishikawa Y; Zhuang X
    Learn Mem; 2010 Mar; 17(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 20189959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice, time and food: continuous cyclical changes in food probability between reinforcers.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):406-21. PubMed ID: 24615528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures.
    Cooper LD; Aronson L; Balsam PD; Gibbon J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 2303790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude.
    Allan RW; Zeigler HP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 7964365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociation of Pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists.
    Dickinson A; Smith J; Mirenowicz J
    Behav Neurosci; 2000 Jun; 114(3):468-83. PubMed ID: 10883798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning.
    Harris JA; Andrew BJ; Kwok DW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23421397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reward magnitude and timing in pigeons.
    Ludvig EA; Balci F; Spetch ML
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 21244854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of discrimination training on responding during a compound conditioned stimulus.
    Pearce JM; Adam J; Wilson PN; Darby RJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Oct; 18(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 1402694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace.
    Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competition between stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and anticipatory contrast.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 1402603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.