These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20400734)

  • 1. Effect of outcome valence on positive and negative patterning in human causal reasoning.
    Whitlow JW
    Learn Behav; 2010 May; 38(2):145-59. PubMed ID: 20400734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative patterning and biconditional discriminations in human causal reasoning: a second look.
    Whitlow JW
    Am J Psychol; 2013; 126(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 23505955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A positive patterning advantage with complex but not simple patterning: a cue constellation approach.
    Whitlow JW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2118-34. PubMed ID: 23506406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans.
    Harris JA; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 18248121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When patterning discriminations are harder than biconditional ones: A cue constellation approach.
    Whitlow JW; Loatman PA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 26147603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elemental, configural, and occasion setting mechanisms in biconditional and patterning discriminations.
    Delamater AR; Garr E; Lawrence S; Whitlow JW
    Behav Processes; 2017 Apr; 137():40-52. PubMed ID: 27826037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Positive and negative patterning in human causal learning.
    Young ME; Wasserman EA; Johnson JL; Jones FL
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 10881604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention.
    Lachnit H; Schultheis H; König S; Ungör M; Melchers K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 18426312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexible Configural Learning of Non-Linear Discriminations and Detection of Stimulus Compounds.
    Glautier S; Menneer T; Godwin HJ; Donnelly N; Aristizabal JA
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Jul; 63(4):215-236. PubMed ID: 27750517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events.
    Cobos PL; López FJ; Luque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 17366306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of pretraining on acquisition of novel configural discriminations in human predictive learning.
    Mehta R; Russell E
    Learn Behav; 2009 Nov; 37(4):311-24. PubMed ID: 19815928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Associative and causal reasoning accounts of causal induction: symmetries and asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic inferences.
    López FJ; Cobos PL; Caño A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1388-98. PubMed ID: 16615386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluid Abilities and Rule Learning: Patterning and Biconditional Discriminations.
    Baetu I; Burns NR; Yu E; Baker AG
    J Intell; 2018 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 31162434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the role of US expectancies in avoidance behavior.
    Declercq M; De Houwer J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 18605487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Summation in causal learning: elemental processing or configural generalization?
    Collins DJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1524-34. PubMed ID: 16873106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 17366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Still the same in human causal reasoning: Evidence for a uniform similarity parameter in generalisation and summation.
    Whitlow JW; Brandon SE; Otero K; Christensen J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):425-442. PubMed ID: 32988296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The hippocampal formation is necessary for rats to learn and remember configural discriminations.
    Rudy JW; Sutherland RJ
    Behav Brain Res; 1989 Aug; 34(1-2):97-109. PubMed ID: 2765175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.