These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20401943)

  • 1. Classification and identification of fungal sequences using characteristic restriction endonuclease cut order.
    Sengupta R; Bastola DR; Ali HH
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2010 Apr; 8(2):181-98. PubMed ID: 20401943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autoscreening of restriction endonucleases for PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism identification of fungal species, with Pleurotus spp. as an example.
    Yang ZH; Huang JX; Yao YJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 73(24):7947-58. PubMed ID: 17965212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilization of the relative complexity measure to construct a phylogenetic tree for fungi.
    Bastola DR; Otu HH; Doukas SE; Sayood K; Hinrichs SH; Iwen PC
    Mycol Res; 2004 Feb; 108(Pt 2):117-25. PubMed ID: 15119348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of enzymes for terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of fungal internally transcribed spacer sequences.
    Alvarado P; Manjón JL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 75(14):4747-52. PubMed ID: 19465521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mycorrhizal and root endophytic fungi of containerized Picea glauca seedlings assessed by rDNA sequence analysis.
    Kernaghan G; Sigler L; Khasa D
    Microb Ecol; 2003 Feb; 45(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 12545311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of ribosomal RNA genes to assess changes in fungal community structure in soils.
    Edel-Hermann V; Dreumont C; Pérez-Piqueres A; Steinberg C
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 Mar; 47(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 19712328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of LSU rRNA-gene PCR primers for analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities via terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.
    Mummey DL; Rillig MC
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Jul; 70(1):200-4. PubMed ID: 17481756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ITS-RFLP matching for identification of fungi.
    Gardes M; Bruns TD
    Methods Mol Biol; 1996; 50():177-86. PubMed ID: 8751358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fungal and Bacterial Diversity of Airway Microbiota in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis: Concordance Between Conventional Methods and Ultra-Deep Sequencing, and Their Practical use in the Clinical Laboratory.
    Botterel F; Angebault C; Cabaret O; Stressmann FA; Costa JM; Wallet F; Wallaert B; Bruce K; Delhaes L
    Mycopathologia; 2018 Feb; 183(1):171-183. PubMed ID: 28766039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 'dirty' business: testing the limitations of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) analysis of soil fungi.
    Avis PG; Dickie IA; Mueller GM
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Mar; 15(3):873-82. PubMed ID: 16499709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis of the ITS region of environmental DNA extracts.
    Martin KJ; Rygiewicz PT
    BMC Microbiol; 2005 May; 5():28. PubMed ID: 15904497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grouping of streptomycetes using 16S-ITS RFLP fingerprinting.
    Lanoot B; Vancanneyt M; Hoste B; Vandemeulebroecke K; Cnockaert MC; Dawyndt P; Liu Z; Huang Y; Swings J
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(5-6):755-62. PubMed ID: 15950131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis of fungal diversity in intestines of Hepialus gonggaensis larvae].
    Yu H; Wang Z; Liu L; Xia Y; Yin Y; Yuan Q; Cao Y; Peng G
    Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2008 Apr; 48(4):439-45. PubMed ID: 18590227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differentiation of anaerobic polycentric fungi by rDNA PCR-RFLP.
    Fliegerová K; Mrázek J; Voigt K
    Folia Microbiol (Praha); 2006; 51(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 17007423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis as a method for the identification of Botryosphaeria species.
    Alves A; Phillips AJ; Henriques I; Correia A
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2005 Apr; 245(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 15837376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular characterization and identification of Saprolegnia by restriction analysis of genes coding for ribosomal RNA.
    Molina FI; Jong SC; Ma G
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 1995 Jul; 68(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 8526483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular characterization of fungal communities in non-tilled, cover-cropped upland rice field soils.
    Nishizawa T; Zhaorigetu ; Komatsuzaki M; Sato Y; Kaneko N; Ohta H
    Microbes Environ; 2010; 25(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 21597240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular characterization of multiple xylanase producing thermophilic/thermotolerant fungi isolated from composting materials.
    Sharma M; Chadha BS; Kaur M; Ghatora SK; Saini HS
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 May; 46(5):526-35. PubMed ID: 18416703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of sequencing the D2 region of the large subunit ribosomal RNA gene (MicroSEQ®) versus the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions using two public databases for identification of common and uncommon clinically relevant fungal species.
    Arbefeville S; Harris A; Ferrieri P
    J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Sep; 140():40-46. PubMed ID: 28647582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of rDNA-PCR amplification and DGGE fingerprinting for detection of microbial diversity in a Malaysian crude oil.
    Liew PW; Jong BC
    J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 May; 18(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 18633276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.