BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20401949)

  • 1. Combinatorial reconstruction of half-sibling groups from microsatellite data.
    Sheikh SI; Berger-Wolf TY; Khokhar AA; Caballero IC; Ashley MV; Chaovalitwongse W; Chou CA; Dasgupta B
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2010 Apr; 8(2):337-56. PubMed ID: 20401949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new version of PRT software for sibling groups reconstruction with comments regarding several issues in the sibling reconstruction problem.
    Almudevar A; Anderson EC
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Jan; 12(1):164-78. PubMed ID: 21883980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IPED2: Inheritance Path Based Pedigree Reconstruction Algorithm for Complicated Pedigrees.
    He D; Wang Z; Parida L; Eskin E
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2017; 14(5):1094-1103. PubMed ID: 28368828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of Trio Half Sibling Testing.
    Li HX; Chen H; Li R; Zang Y; Sun HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 37517013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Algorithms of likelihood ratio for discriminating full sibling from half sibling].
    Zhao SM; Zhang LN; Zhang SH; Zhang N; Zhao ZM; Li CT
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 28(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 22619804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IPED2X: a robust pedigree reconstruction algorithm for complicated pedigrees.
    He D; Eskin E
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(6):1442007. PubMed ID: 25553812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Application of ITO method and discriminant functions in full sibling and half sibling identification].
    Lu HL; Zhou KW; Lü DJ; Yao YN; Zhang YQ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 25(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 19537252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconstructing sibling relationships in wild populations.
    Berger-Wolf TY; Sheikh SI; DasGupta B; Ashley MV; Caballero IC; Chaovalitwongse W; Putrevu SL
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i49-56. PubMed ID: 17646334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. About the power of biostatistics in sibling analysis-comparison of empirical and simulated data.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Podruks E; Schwark T; Göpel W; Fimmers R; Poetsch M
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 Nov; 129(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 26292643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sibling assessment based on likelihood ratio and total number of shared alleles using 21 short tandem repeat loci included in the GlobalFiler™ kit.
    Inoue H; Manabe S; Fujii K; Iwashima Y; Miyama S; Tanaka A; Saitoh H; Iwase H; Tamaki K; Sekiguchi K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Mar; 19():122-6. PubMed ID: 26254055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FLOCK provides reliable solutions to the "number of populations" problem.
    Duchesne P; Turgeon J
    J Hered; 2012; 103(5):734-43. PubMed ID: 22615162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The imperfect ancestral recombination graph reconstruction problem: upper bounds for recombination and homoplasy.
    Lam F; Tarpine R; Istrail S
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):767-81. PubMed ID: 20583925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Application of Multiple Genetic Markers in a Case of Determination of Half Sibling].
    Yang X; Shi MS; Yuan L; Lu D
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 32(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 27295857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast half-sibling population reconstruction: theory and algorithms.
    Dexter D; Brown DG
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2013 Jul; 8(1):20. PubMed ID: 23849037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microsatellite diversity predicts recruitment of sibling great reed warblers.
    Hansson B; Bensch S; Hasselquist D; Akesson M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jun; 268(1473):1287-91. PubMed ID: 11410156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Identification of sibling brothers using STR and Y-biallelic markers].
    Tang MY; Huang J; Cai JH; Huang XS; Xu W; Qu ZX; Shan FB; Lu HL
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 28(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 22812220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further considerations for power in sibling interaction models.
    Neale BM; Rijsdijk FV
    Behav Genet; 2005 Sep; 35(5):671-4. PubMed ID: 16184493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance by female crickets only revealed by molecular markers.
    Simmons LW; Beveridge M; Wedell N; Tregenza T
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Oct; 15(12):3817-24. PubMed ID: 17032276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PILER: identification and classification of genomic repeats.
    Edgar RC; Myers EW
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i152-8. PubMed ID: 15961452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Merging microsatellite data.
    Presson AP; Sobel E; Lange K; Papp JC
    J Comput Biol; 2006; 13(6):1131-47. PubMed ID: 16901233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.