127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20402431)
1. Correction for Rhiel's theory for the range estimator of the coefficient of variation for skewed distributions.
Rhiel GS
Psychol Rep; 2010 Feb; 106(1):93-4. PubMed ID: 20402431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A proof for Rhiel's range estimator of the coefficient of variation for skewed distributions.
Rhiel GS
Psychol Rep; 2007 Feb; 100(1):208-10. PubMed ID: 17451028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should we rely on the Kenward-Roger approximation when using linear mixed models if the groups have different distributions?
Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):408-29. PubMed ID: 24028625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
Cousineau D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
Chan W; Chan DW
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wilcoxon test after Levene's transformation can have an inflated Type I error rate.
Neuhäuser M
Psychol Rep; 2004 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1419-20. PubMed ID: 15362426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction.
Marsh HW; Wen Z; Hau KT
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):275-300. PubMed ID: 15355150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coefficient of variation calculated from the range for skewed distributions.
Rhiel GS
Psychol Rep; 2006 Feb; 98(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 16673953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable.
Hayes AF; Preacher KJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):451-70. PubMed ID: 24188158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Location tests for biomarker studies: a comparison using simulations for the two-sample case.
Scheinhardt MO; Ziegler A
Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 23877617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using the range to calculate the coefficient of variation.
Rhiel GS
Psychol Rep; 2004 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):1043-9. PubMed ID: 15666953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Killeen's (2005) p rep coefficient: logical and mathematical problems.
Maraun M; Gabriel S
Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 20515239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
Fan C; Zhang D; Zhang CH
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1172-87. PubMed ID: 23957522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An SAS/IML procedure for maximum likelihood factor analysis.
Chen R
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 12834089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A model-averaging approach to replication: the case of p rep.
Iverson GJ; Wagenmakers EJ; Lee MD
Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 20515238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating slope and level change in N = 1 designs.
Solanas A; Manolov R; Onghena P
Behav Modif; 2010 May; 34(3):195-218. PubMed ID: 20234005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods for meta-analysis.
Van Den Noortgate W; Onghena P
Behav Res Methods; 2005 Feb; 37(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 16097340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simple efficient bias corrected instrumental variable estimator for randomized trials with noncompliance.
Chan KC
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 22484340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient estimating approaches with skewed data.
Carrasco JL; Jover L; King TS; Chinchilli VM
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 17613647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data.
Sinharay S; Stern HS; Russell D
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):317-29. PubMed ID: 11778675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
