267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20404406)
1. Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals.
Bottari D; Nava E; Ley P; Pavani F
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2010; 28(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 20404406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Altered spatial distribution of visual attention in near and far space after early deafness.
Chen Q; He G; Chen K; Jin Z; Mo L
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2693-8. PubMed ID: 20478322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (IOR) on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people.
Chen Q; Zhang M; Zhou X
Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 16859649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness.
Proksch J; Bavelier D
J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Jul; 14(5):687-701. PubMed ID: 12167254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test.
Dye MW; Baril DE; Bavelier D
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1801-11. PubMed ID: 17291549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task.
Helton WS
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18608658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Change blindness in profoundly deaf individuals and cochlear implant recipients.
Bottari D; Turatto M; Bonfioli F; Abbadessa C; Selmi S; Beltrame MA; Pavani F
Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():209-18. PubMed ID: 18597741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit?
Naili F; Boucart M; Derambure P; Arndt C
Epilepsy Res; 2009 Dec; 87(2-3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19800764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in deaf and hearing subjects.
Reynolds HN
Am J Psychol; 1993; 106(4):523-40. PubMed ID: 8296925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attentional orienting to social and nonsocial cues in early deaf adults.
Heimler B; van Zoest W; Baruffaldi F; Rinaldi P; Caselli MC; Pavani F
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1758-71. PubMed ID: 26280262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.
Cattani A; Clibbens J; Perfect TJ
Neuropsychology; 2007 Jan; 21(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 17201534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attentional spread in deaf and hearing participants: face and object distractor processing under perceptual load.
Hauthal N; Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1312-20. PubMed ID: 22638944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
Rodway P
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual temporal order judgment in profoundly deaf individuals.
Nava E; Bottari D; Zampini M; Pavani F
Exp Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 190(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 18563399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fear-object perception: does it entail the involuntary capture of attention?
Sebastiani L; Castellani E; Dalessandro L
Arch Ital Biol; 2010 Mar; 148(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20426252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.
Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):152-69. PubMed ID: 12027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
