These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20405159)

  • 1. Spanish recommendations on economic evaluation of health technologies.
    López-Bastida J; Oliva J; Antoñanzas F; García-Altés A; Gisbert R; Mar J; Puig-Junoy J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2010 Oct; 11(5):513-20. PubMed ID: 20405159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A proposed guideline for economic evaluation of health technologies].
    López Bastida J; Oliva J; Antoñanzas F; García-Altés A; Gisbert R; Mar J; Puig-Junoy J
    Gac Sanit; 2010; 24(2):154-70. PubMed ID: 19959258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Presentation of economic evaluation results.
    Chaikledkaew U; Teerawattananon Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S66-73. PubMed ID: 19253489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Economic evaluation of health technologies: theory and practice].
    Abadi-Korek I; Shemer J
    Harefuah; 2008 Jun; 147(6):509-11, 574. PubMed ID: 18693627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis in relation to budgetary constraints and reallocative restrictions.
    Adang E; Voordijk L; Jan van der Wilt G; Ament A
    Health Policy; 2005 Oct; 74(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 16153475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic evaluation guidelines in Latin America: a current snapshot.
    Augustovski F; Garay OU; Pichon-Riviere A; Rubinstein A; Caporale JE
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Oct; 10(5):525-37. PubMed ID: 20950069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A changing paradigm in the study and adoption of emerging health care technologies: coverage with evidence development.
    Wallner PE; Konski A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Nov; 5(11):1125-9. PubMed ID: 18954812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health system and equity perspectives in health technology assessment.
    Hanvoravongchai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S74-87. PubMed ID: 19253490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic evaluation in cardiology.
    Maniadakis N; Vardas P; Mantovani LG; Fattore G; Boriani G
    Europace; 2011 May; 13 Suppl 2():ii3-8. PubMed ID: 21518746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidelines for the adoption of new technologies: a prescription for uncontrolled growth in expenditures and how to avoid the problem.
    Gafni A; Birch S
    CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):913-7. PubMed ID: 8448705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions.
    Drummond MF; Schwartz JS; Jönsson B; Luce BR; Neumann PJ; Siebert U; Sullivan SD
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):244-58; discussion 362-8. PubMed ID: 18601792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of technology on health care cost and policy development.
    Wallner PE; Konski A
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2008 Jul; 18(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 18513629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comments by the Working Group for Methods of Economic Evaluation in Health Care (AG MEG) to IQWiG's Draft Guidelines "Methods for Assessment of the Relation of Benefits to Costs in the German Statutory Health Care System"].
    Krauth C; John J; Aidelsburger P; Brüggenjürgen B; Hansmeier T; Hessel F; Kohlmann T; Moock J; Rothgang H; Schweikert B; Seitz R; Wasem J;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2008 Jun; 70(6):e1-16. PubMed ID: 18661452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Guidelines for health-economic evaluations in Austria].
    Walter E; Zehetmayr S
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2006 Dec; 156(23-24):628-32. PubMed ID: 17211768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The future of best investing in vaccines: the Health Technology Assessment approach.
    La Torre G; de Waure C; Chiaradia G; Mannocci A; Specchia ML; Nicolotti N; Ricciardi W
    Vaccine; 2008 Mar; 26(13):1609-10. PubMed ID: 18289744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conditionally funded field evaluations and practical trial design within a health technology assessment framework.
    Bowen JM; Patterson LL; O'Reilly D; Hopkins RB; Blackhouse G; Burke N; Xie F; Tarride JE; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 19394573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidelines for health technologies: specific guidance for oncology products in Canada.
    Mittmann N; Evans WK; Rocchi A; Longo CJ; Au HJ; Husereau D; Leighl NB; Isogai PK; Krahn MD; Peacock S; Marshall D; Coyle D; Taylor SC; Jacobs P; Oh PI
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):580-5. PubMed ID: 22583470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Presentation of economic evaluation results.
    Chaikledkaew U
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S72-80. PubMed ID: 24964702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.