These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20405470)

  • 1. Emergency airway placement by EMS providers: comparison between the King LT supralaryngeal airway and endotracheal intubation.
    Burns JB; Branson R; Barnes SL; Tsuei BJ
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2010; 25(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 20405470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Airway Management in Disaster Response: A Manikin Study Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation by Prehospital Providers in Level C Personal Protective Equipment.
    Yousif S; Machan JT; Alaska Y; Suner S
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Aug; 32(4):352-356. PubMed ID: 28318455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the King-LT to endotracheal intubation and Combitube in a simulated difficult airway.
    Russi CS; Miller L; Hartley MJ
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2008; 12(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 18189175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prehospital pediatric King LT-D use: a pilot study.
    Ritter SC; Guyette FX
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(3):401-4. PubMed ID: 21480773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison Of The I-Gel Supraglottic And King Laryngotracheal Airways In A Simulated Tactical Environment.
    March JA; Tassey TE; Resurreccion NB; Portela RC; Taylor SE
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2018; 22(3):385-389. PubMed ID: 29364743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of System-Wide King LT Airway Implementation on Orotracheal Intubation.
    Hilton MT; Wayne M; Martin-Gill C
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2016; 20(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 27058646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The laryngeal tube device: a simple and timely adjunct to airway management.
    Russi CS; Wilcox CL; House HR
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Mar; 25(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 17349898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Airway Management Methods in Entrapped Patients: A Manikin Study.
    Martin AB; Lingg J; Lubin JS
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2016; 20(5):657-61. PubMed ID: 26954013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intubation Efficiency and Perceived Ease of Use of Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy While Wearing HazMat PPE: A Preliminary High-fidelity Mannequin Study.
    Aberle SJ; Sandefur BJ; Sunga KL; Campbell RL; Lohse CM; Alecastro Puls H; Laudon S; Sztajnkrycer MD
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2015 Jun; 30(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 25959708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The King LT versus the Combitube: flight crew performance and preference.
    Tumpach EA; Lutes M; Ford D; Lerner EB
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 19499468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Paramedic King Laryngeal Tube airway insertion versus endotracheal intubation in simulated pediatric respiratory arrest.
    Mitchell MS; Lee White M; King WD; Wang HE
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2012; 16(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 22229954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized trial of endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in simulated prehospital pediatric arrest.
    Chen L; Hsiao AL
    Pediatrics; 2008 Aug; 122(2):e294-7. PubMed ID: 18644845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. King LT-D use by urban basic life support first responders as the primary airway device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Gahan K; Studnek JR; Vandeventer S
    Resuscitation; 2011 Dec; 82(12):1525-8. PubMed ID: 21756859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A pilot study of the King LT supralaryngeal airway use in a rural Iowa EMS system.
    Russi CS; Hartley MJ; Buresh CT
    Int J Emerg Med; 2008 Jun; 1(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 19384666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supraglottic airway device use as a primary airway during rapid sequence intubation.
    Frascone RJ; Wewerka SS; Burnett AM; Griffith KR; Salzman JG
    Air Med J; 2013; 32(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 23452368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors for unsuccessful prehospital laryngeal tube placement.
    Martin-Gill C; Prunty HA; Ritter SC; Carlson JN; Guyette FX
    Resuscitation; 2015 Jan; 86():25-30. PubMed ID: 25447434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Force Required for Dislodgement Between Secured and Unsecured Airways.
    Davenport C; Martin-Gill C; Wang HE; Mayrose J; Carlson JN
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2018; 22(6):778-781. PubMed ID: 29714527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of prehospital insertion success rates and time to insertion between standard endotracheal intubation and a supraglottic airway.
    Frascone RJ; Russi C; Lick C; Conterato M; Wewerka SS; Griffith KR; Myers L; Conners J; Salzman JG
    Resuscitation; 2011 Dec; 82(12):1529-36. PubMed ID: 21763247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An unanticipated complication of a novel approach to airway management.
    Lutes M; Worman DJ
    J Emerg Med; 2010 Feb; 38(2):222-4. PubMed ID: 19150195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing no-flow time during endotracheal intubation versus placement of a laryngeal mask airway during a simulated cardiac arrest scenario.
    Miller VJ; Flaherty EE
    Simul Healthc; 2014 Jun; 9(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 24310162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.