These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The bioethics of human fetal tissue research and therapy: moral decision making of professionals. Cefalo RC; Berghmans RL; Hall SP Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):12-9. PubMed ID: 8296813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioethics for clinicians: 12. Ethical dilemmas that arise in the care of pregnant women: rethinking "maternal-fetal conflicts". Flagler E; Baylis F; Rodgers S CMAJ; 1997 Jun; 156(12):1729-32. PubMed ID: 9220925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion on demand in France? a five-year trial for the "time limit solution". Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 11663656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential constitutional issues raised by the proposed amendments to the Georgia abortion statute. Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Feb; 71(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 7077199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioethics discovers the Bill of Rights. Veatch RM Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):11-3. PubMed ID: 16100834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical issues in obstetrics. Samsioe G; Abreg A Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 8799757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CMA abortion survey. Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Aug; 129(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 6861064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproductive health and blurred professional boundaries. Chavkin W; Breitbart V Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 8932462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Who makes the abortion decision?: law, practice, and the limits of the liberal solution. Lamanna MA Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():9-20. PubMed ID: 12317577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Procreative torts: enhancing the common-law protection for reproductive autonomy. Northern KS Univ Ill Law Rev; 1998; 1998(2):489-546. PubMed ID: 12774812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Some doctors' dilemmas. Harrell GT Brethr Life Thought; 1976; 21(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 11661537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Request of the Spanish Society of bioethics and medical ethics addressed to the General Council of Official Colleges of Physicians and the Central Commission on Deontology and Medical Law, on the conscientious objection regarding several aspects of the Organic Law 2/2010 on sexual and reproductive health and the voluntary interruption of pregnancy]. Cuad Bioet; 2010; 21(73):419-22. PubMed ID: 21495245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and self-defense. Davis N Philos Public Aff; 1984; 13(3):175-207. PubMed ID: 11655659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and the law: the Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion. Marsh FH Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():107-23. PubMed ID: 12348324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The ideology of the common good and legislative issues concerning abortion]. Marques Pereira B Rev Inst Sociol; 1984; (1-2):239-56. PubMed ID: 12313959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]