These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20406465)
1. The role of tibialis posterior fatigue on foot kinematics during walking. Pohl MB; Rabbito M; Ferber R J Foot Ankle Res; 2010 Apr; 3():6. PubMed ID: 20406465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in joint coupling and variability during walking following tibialis posterior muscle fatigue. Ferber R; Pohl MB J Foot Ankle Res; 2011 Feb; 4():6. PubMed ID: 21294889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking. Rattanaprasert U; Smith R; Sullivan M; Gilleard W Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jan; 14(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 10619086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls. Tome J; Nawoczenski DA; Flemister A; Houck J J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2006 Sep; 36(9):635-44. PubMed ID: 17017268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical measures of hip and foot-ankle mechanics as predictors of rearfoot motion and posture. Souza TR; Mancini MC; Araújo VL; Carvalhais VO; Ocarino JM; Silva PL; Fonseca ST Man Ther; 2014 Oct; 19(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 24268425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Forefoot midsole stiffness affects forefoot and rearfoot kinematics during the stance phase of gait. Resende RA; Fonseca ST; Silva PL; Pertence AE; Kirkwood RN J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 104(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24725040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of changing mediolateral center of pressure on rearfoot eversion during treadmill running. Mousavi SH; van Kouwenhove L; Rajabi R; Zwerver J; Hijmans JM Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():201-209. PubMed ID: 33171373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Step width modification to change rearfoot eversion and medial longitudinal arch angle during walking and running in individuals with pronated feet. Khorramroo F; Mousavi SH; Hijmans JM Gait Posture; 2024 Jul; 113():366-373. PubMed ID: 39068870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking. Monaghan GM; Lewis CL; Hsu WH; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG Gait Posture; 2013 May; 38(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23117096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in Kinematic Coupling Among the Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Segments During Running and Walking. Takabayashi T; Edama M; Yokoyama E; Kanaya C; Inai T; Tokunaga Y; Kubo M J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 108(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 29547030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fore- and rearfoot kinematics in high- and low-arched individuals during running. Barnes A; Wheat J; Milner CE Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Jul; 32(7):710-6. PubMed ID: 21972767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationships between the Foot Posture Index and foot kinematics during gait in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. Barton CJ; Levinger P; Crossley KM; Webster KE; Menz HB J Foot Ankle Res; 2011 Mar; 4():10. PubMed ID: 21401957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of changing foot progression angle using real-time visual feedback on rearfoot eversion during running. Mousavi SH; van Kouwenhove L; Rajabi R; Zwerver J; Hijmans JM PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246425. PubMed ID: 33566828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fatigue related changes in rearfoot eversion: a means of functionally grouping runners? Langley B Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Mar; 23(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 35394890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait. Pohl MB; Messenger N; Buckley JG Gait Posture; 2007 Feb; 25(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 16759862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running. Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the rigidity and forefoot - Rearfoot kinematics from three forefoot tracking marker clusters during walking and weight-bearing foot pronation-supination. Magalhães FA; Souza TR; Araújo VL; Oliveira LM; Silveira LP; Ocarino JM; Fonseca ST J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 98():109381. PubMed ID: 31676084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting Dynamic Foot Function From Static Foot Posture: Comparison Between Visual Assessment, Motion Analysis, and a Commercially Available Depth Camera. Paterson KL; Clark RA; Mullins A; Bryant AL; Mentiplay BF J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Oct; 45(10):789-98. PubMed ID: 26304638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between rearfoot, tibial and hip kinematics in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Barton CJ; Levinger P; Crossley KM; Webster KE; Menz HB Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):702-5. PubMed ID: 22436492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying rearfoot-forefoot coordination in human walking. Chang R; Van Emmerik R; Hamill J J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):3101-5. PubMed ID: 18778823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]