BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20406495)

  • 1. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
    Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
    Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of residential geocoding in the Agricultural Health Study.
    Jones RR; DellaValle CT; Flory AR; Nordan A; Hoppin JA; Hofmann JN; Chen H; Giglierano J; Lynch CF; Beane Freeman LE; Rushton G; Ward MH
    Int J Health Geogr; 2014 Oct; 13():37. PubMed ID: 25292160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding.
    Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S; Rushton G
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 17214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved Geocoding of Cancer Registry Addresses in Urban and Rural Oklahoma.
    Dilekli N; Janitz A; Campbell J
    J Registry Manag; 2020; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 32833379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positional accuracy of two methods of geocoding.
    Ward MH; Nuckols JR; Giglierano J; Bonner MR; Wolter C; Airola M; Mix W; Colt JS; Hartge P
    Epidemiology; 2005 Jul; 16(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 15951673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
    Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
    Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impacts of geocoding uncertainty on reconstructed PFOA exposures and their epidemiological association with preeclampsia.
    Avanasi R; Shin HM; Vieira VM; Bartell SM
    Environ Res; 2016 Nov; 151():505-512. PubMed ID: 27567354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of local street network characteristics on the positional accuracy of automated geocoding for geographic health studies.
    Zimmerman DL; Li J
    Int J Health Geogr; 2010 Feb; 9():10. PubMed ID: 20158886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of geocoding quality on environmental exposure assessment of children living near high traffic roads.
    Zandbergen PA
    BMC Public Health; 2007 Mar; 7():37. PubMed ID: 17367533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses.
    Cayo MR; Talbot TO
    Int J Health Geogr; 2003 Dec; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 14687425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
    Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
    Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Match rate and positional accuracy of two geocoding methods for epidemiologic research.
    Zhan FB; Brender JD; De Lima I; Suarez L; Langlois PH
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):842-9. PubMed ID: 17027286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Positional accuracy of geocoded addresses in epidemiologic research.
    Bonner MR; Han D; Nie J; Rogerson P; Vena JE; Freudenheim JL
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 12843763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positional accuracy of geocoding from residential postal codes versus full street addresses.
    Khan S; Pinault L; Tjepkema M; Wilkins R
    Health Rep; 2018 Feb; 29(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 29465738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].
    Lemke D; Mattauch V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Sep; 77(8-9):e160-5. PubMed ID: 26154258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.
    Kinnee EJ; Tripathy S; Schinasi L; Shmool JLC; Sheffield PE; Holguin F; Clougherty JE
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32806682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positional error and time-activity patterns in near-highway proximity studies: an exposure misclassification analysis.
    Lane KJ; Kangsen Scammell M; Levy JI; Fuller CH; Parambi R; Zamore W; Mwamburi M; Brugge D
    Environ Health; 2013 Sep; 12(1):75. PubMed ID: 24010639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?
    Lovasi GS; Weiss JC; Hoskins R; Whitsel EA; Rice K; Erickson CF; Psaty BM
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 17367520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Spatial Distribution of Perfluorooctanoic Acid Exposure via Public Drinking Water Pipes Using Geographic Information Systems.
    Vieira V; Hoffman K; Fletcher T
    Environ Health Toxicol; 2013; 28():e2013009. PubMed ID: 24010064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smartphone-assisted spatial data collection improves geographic information quality: pilot study using a birth records dataset.
    Xu X; Hu H; Ha S; Han D
    Geospat Health; 2016 Nov; 11(3):482. PubMed ID: 27903063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.