These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20406827)

  • 1. The Stoke CNEP saga--a view from the General Medical Council.
    Catto G
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Aug; 103(8):313-6. PubMed ID: 20406827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Stoke CNEP Saga - how it damaged all involved.
    Wright T
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Jul; 103(7):277-82. PubMed ID: 20406828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Stoke CNEP saga - did it need to take so long?
    Wells F
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Sep; 103(9):352-6. PubMed ID: 20406829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Stoke CNEP Saga - the Government enquiry in retrospect.
    Griffiths R
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Jun; 103(6):226-30. PubMed ID: 20406830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP trial true?
    Hey E; Chalmers I
    Lancet; 2006 Apr; 367(9516):1032-1033. PubMed ID: 16581384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The CNEP trial: how a good trial was turned rotten.
    Abbasi K
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Apr; 103(4):121-2. PubMed ID: 20382896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process.
    Hey E; Chalmers I
    BMJ; 2000 Sep; 321(7263):752-5. PubMed ID: 10999913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Southall's CNEP trial more than stands up to scrutiny.
    The Lancet
    Lancet; 2006 Apr; 367(9516):1030. PubMed ID: 16581381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Nurses undertaking the CNEP trial give their support and describe their experiences.
    Wright T; Luckuing K
    BMJ; 2000 Nov; 321(7272):1346; author reply 1348-9. PubMed ID: 11186440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inquiring into inquiries.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2000 Sep; 321(7263):715-6. PubMed ID: 10999883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. CNEP trial was greatly flawed.
    Henshall C; Henshall D
    BMJ; 2000 Nov; 321(7272):1345-6; author reply 1348-9. PubMed ID: 11090524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the media in the Stoke CNEP saga.
    Gornall J
    J R Soc Med; 2010 May; 103(5):173-7. PubMed ID: 20406826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of the neonatal Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure (CNEP) trial enquiries on research in the UK.
    Modi N; McIntosh N
    Arch Dis Child; 2011 Jun; 96(6):500-4. PubMed ID: 21266336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulating research, regulating professionals.
    Dixon-Woods M
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Apr; 103(4):125-6. PubMed ID: 20382898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GMC refers investigator in libel case to fitness to practise panel.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2012 Sep; 345():e6291. PubMed ID: 22993398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response from members of the Griffiths inquiry.
    Griffiths R; Stacey TE; Struthers J
    BMJ; 2000 Sep; 321(7263):755-6. PubMed ID: 11041636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CNEP and research governance.
    Griffiths R
    Lancet; 2006 Apr; 367(9516):1037-1038. PubMed ID: 16581387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mis-investigating alleged research misconduct can cause widespread, unpredictable damage.
    Hey E; Chalmers I
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Apr; 103(4):133-8. PubMed ID: 20382904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GP struck off for fraud in drug trials.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):798. PubMed ID: 8608283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Response to concerns raised by Mr. and Mrs. Henshall.
    Hey E
    BMJ; 2000 Nov; 321(7272):1348-9. PubMed ID: 11186441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.