These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20406829)

  • 1. The Stoke CNEP saga - did it need to take so long?
    Wells F
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Sep; 103(9):352-6. PubMed ID: 20406829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Stoke CNEP saga--a view from the General Medical Council.
    Catto G
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Aug; 103(8):313-6. PubMed ID: 20406827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Stoke CNEP Saga - the Government enquiry in retrospect.
    Griffiths R
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Jun; 103(6):226-30. PubMed ID: 20406830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Stoke CNEP Saga - how it damaged all involved.
    Wright T
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Jul; 103(7):277-82. PubMed ID: 20406828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP trial true?
    Hey E; Chalmers I
    Lancet; 2006 Apr; 367(9516):1032-1033. PubMed ID: 16581384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process.
    Hey E; Chalmers I
    BMJ; 2000 Sep; 321(7263):752-5. PubMed ID: 10999913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Southall's CNEP trial more than stands up to scrutiny.
    The Lancet
    Lancet; 2006 Apr; 367(9516):1030. PubMed ID: 16581381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Headache doctor found guilty of dishonesty in research misconduct case.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2015 Feb; 350():h709. PubMed ID: 25659652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. CNEP trial was greatly flawed.
    Henshall C; Henshall D
    BMJ; 2000 Nov; 321(7272):1345-6; author reply 1348-9. PubMed ID: 11090524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: is it prejudicial to patient safety?
    Wells F
    Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev; 1992; 11(4):241-55. PubMed ID: 1489884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The CNEP trial: how a good trial was turned rotten.
    Abbasi K
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Apr; 103(4):121-2. PubMed ID: 20382896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Procedure for investigation of research misconduct--active treatment or sham intervention?
    Wilmshurst P
    J R Soc Med; 2008 Nov; 101(11):524-5. PubMed ID: 19029346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inquiring into inquiries.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2000 Sep; 321(7263):715-6. PubMed ID: 10999883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of the neonatal Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure (CNEP) trial enquiries on research in the UK.
    Modi N; McIntosh N
    Arch Dis Child; 2011 Jun; 96(6):500-4. PubMed ID: 21266336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of the media in the Stoke CNEP saga.
    Gornall J
    J R Soc Med; 2010 May; 103(5):173-7. PubMed ID: 20406826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Nurses undertaking the CNEP trial give their support and describe their experiences.
    Wright T; Luckuing K
    BMJ; 2000 Nov; 321(7272):1346; author reply 1348-9. PubMed ID: 11186440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulating research, regulating professionals.
    Dixon-Woods M
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Apr; 103(4):125-6. PubMed ID: 20382898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of research misconduct--in practice.
    Wells FO
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 8308473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Will the UK cope?
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioanalyst gets jail sentence for falsifying preclinical trial data.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2514. PubMed ID: 23599322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.