These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20407186)

  • 1. I.5. Biomechanics of implants.
    Hazenberg JG; Schmid J; Lee TC; Verkerke GJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 152():58-65. PubMed ID: 20407186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanics of implants.
    Hazenberg JG; Schmid J; Lee TC; Verkerke GJ
    Technol Health Care; 2011; 19(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 21610303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Nov; 28(9):916-24. PubMed ID: 16464628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Design of partial pelvic replacement with calculation of stresses on the pelvic bone using the finite element method].
    Wittler G; Frankenberger H; Rehder U
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989 Dec; 34(12):301-7. PubMed ID: 2620083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized mechanical validation of custom-made stems.
    Viceconti M; Bellingeri L; Baleani M; Toni A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1997; 82(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 9494243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical simulation of the superplastic forming of dental and medical prostheses.
    Bonet J; Wood RD; Said R; Curtis RV; Garriga-Majo D
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2002 Dec; 1(3):177-96. PubMed ID: 14586698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Fast automated finite element mesh generation of residual lower limb for clinical application].
    Jiang WT; Fan YB; Pu F; Zhang M; Zheng YP; Chen JK
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2002 Aug; 15(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 12425337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and analysis of modular uniaxial leg adapter.
    Dincel O; Gursel KT; Yildiz H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Mar; 31(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 17365881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of ventilation tube design on the magnitude of stress imposed at the implant/tympanic membrane interface.
    Vard JP; Kelly DJ; Blayney AW; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Mar; 30(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 17531521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element analysis and stent design: Reduction of dogboning.
    De Beule M; Van Impe R; Verhegghe B; Segers P; Verdonck P
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):233-41. PubMed ID: 17065746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of a TMJ implant.
    Kashi A; Chowdhury AR; Saha S
    J Dent Res; 2010 Mar; 89(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 20042741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design of monolimb using finite element modelling and statistics-based Taguchi method.
    Lee WC; Zhang M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Aug; 20(7):759-66. PubMed ID: 15963612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided tissue engineering of a human vertebral body.
    Wettergreen MA; Bucklen BS; Sun W; Liebschner MA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Oct; 33(10):1333-43. PubMed ID: 16240082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of modelling to predict implant behaviour.
    Ong K; Kurtz S
    Med Device Technol; 2008 Sep; 19(5):64-6. PubMed ID: 18947155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket.
    Lee WC; Zhang M; Jia X; Cheung JT
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Oct; 26(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 15471693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
    Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer model analysis of the Swanson and Sutter metacarpophalangeal joint implants.
    Williams NW; Penrose JM; Hose DR
    J Hand Surg Br; 2000 Apr; 25(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 11062585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
    Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical simulation of the effect of time-to-loading on peri-implant bone.
    Akça K; Eser A; Canay S
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 19864171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.