BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

664 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20407368)

  • 1. Discarding the first of three nurse-auscultatory or oscillometric blood pressure measurements does not improve the association of office blood pressure with ABPM.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Jun; 15(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 20407368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings.
    Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):108-11. PubMed ID: 19417634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
    Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ABPM vs office blood pressure to define blood pressure control in treated hypertensive paediatric renal transplant recipients.
    Ferraris JR; Ghezzi L; Waisman G; Krmar RT
    Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Feb; 11(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 17239120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Home blood pressure in children and adolescents: a comparison with office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements.
    Salgado CM; Jardim PC; Viana JK; Jardim Tde S; Velasquez PP
    Acta Paediatr; 2011 Oct; 100(10):e163-8. PubMed ID: 21457301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The optimal scheme of self blood pressure measurement as determined from ambulatory blood pressure recordings.
    Verberk WJ; Kroon AA; Kessels AG; Lenders JW; Thien T; van Montfrans GA; Smit AJ; de Leeuw PW
    J Hypertens; 2006 Aug; 24(8):1541-8. PubMed ID: 16877956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure control by treatment in general practice: the 'Monitoraggio della pressione ARteriosa nella medicina TErritoriale' study.
    Zaninelli A; Parati G; Cricelli C; Bignamini AA; Modesti PA; Pamparana F; Bilo G; Mancia G; Gensini GF;
    J Hypertens; 2010 May; 28(5):910-7. PubMed ID: 20139769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer.
    Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 19020423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Office-hour' ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is sufficient for blood pressure diagnosis.
    Wong RC; Yeo TC
    J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jun; 20(6):440-3. PubMed ID: 16598289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. White coat effect in treated and untreated patients with high office blood pressure. Relationship with pulse wave velocity and left ventricular mass index.
    Silveira A; Mesquita A; Maldonado J; Silva JA; Polónia J
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 May; 21(5):517-30. PubMed ID: 12174516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misclassification of blood pressure by usual measurement in ambulatory physician practices.
    Campbell NR; Culleton BW; McKay DW
    Am J Hypertens; 2005 Dec; 18(12 Pt 1):1522-7. PubMed ID: 16364819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated office versus home measurement of blood pressure in the assessment of morning hypertension.
    Andreadis EA; Angelopoulos ET; Tsakanikas AP; Agaliotis GD; Kravvariti SD; Mousoulis GP
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Feb; 17(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 22218221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
    Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring in kidney transplant recipients is more adequate to monitor BP than office BP.
    Agena F; Prado Edos S; Souza PS; da Silva GV; Lemos FB; Mion D; Nahas WC; David-Neto E
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Nov; 26(11):3745-9. PubMed ID: 21441398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study on auscultatory and oscillometric methods of ambulatory blood pressure measurements in adult patients.
    Genç Y; Altunkan S; Kilinç O; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18199921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two automated sphygmomanometers for use in the office setting.
    Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A; Tobe SW
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Feb; 14(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 19190490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility and reproducibility of noninvasive 24-h ambulatory aortic blood pressure monitoring with a brachial cuff-based oscillometric device.
    Protogerou AD; Argyris A; Nasothimiou E; Vrachatis D; Papaioannou TG; Tzamouranis D; Blacher J; Safar ME; Sfikakis P; Stergiou GS
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Aug; 25(8):876-82. PubMed ID: 22673021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term reproducibility of routine ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in stable pediatric renal transplant recipients.
    Krmar RT; Berg UB
    Am J Hypertens; 2005 Nov; 18(11):1408-14. PubMed ID: 16280272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. A comparative study of oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement].
    Raymond IE; Malmqvist BB; Wiinberg N; Bang LE; Petersen LJ; Svendsen TL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Sep; 159(37):5519-24. PubMed ID: 9312921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.