These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20408043)

  • 21. The effects of immediate versus delayed feedback on complex concept learning.
    Corral D; Carpenter SK; Clingan-Siverly S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Apr; 74(4):786-799. PubMed ID: 33208050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are pictures good for learning new vocabulary in a foreign language? Only if you think they are not.
    Carpenter SK; Olson KM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 21787105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differing effects of gain and loss feedback on rule-based and information-integration category learning.
    Liu Z; Zhang Y; Ma D; Xu Q; Seger CA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):274-282. PubMed ID: 33006121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning.
    Hays MJ; Kornell N; Bjork RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):797-801. PubMed ID: 21169571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How does error correction occur during lexical learning?
    Iwaki N; Takahashi I; Kaneko S
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1272-1287. PubMed ID: 38488873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Feedback reduces the metacognitive benefit of tests.
    Kornell N; Rhodes MG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Mar; 19(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 23544472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Confirmation bias in human reinforcement learning: Evidence from counterfactual feedback processing.
    Palminteri S; Lefebvre G; Kilford EJ; Blakemore SJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 13(8):e1005684. PubMed ID: 28800597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Curiosity: The effects of feedback and confidence on the desire to know.
    Metcalfe J; Vuorre M; Towner E; Eich TS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Feb; 152(2):464-482. PubMed ID: 36048057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
    Smith TA; Kimball DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Manipulating memory associations changes decision-making preferences in a preconditioning task.
    Wang J; Otgaar H; Smeets T; Howe ML; Zhou C
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Mar; 69():103-112. PubMed ID: 30739068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Delayed, but not immediate, feedback after multiple-choice questions increases performance on a subsequent short-answer, but not multiple-choice, exam: evidence for the dual-process theory of memory.
    Sinha N; Glass AL
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(2):118-34. PubMed ID: 25832741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of response repetition as an error-correction strategy during sight-word reading.
    Worsdell AS; Iwata BA; Dozier CL; Johnson AD; Neidert PL; Thomason JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(4):511-27. PubMed ID: 16463531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beyond right or wrong: More effective feedback for formative multiple-choice tests.
    Ryan A; Judd T; Swanson D; Larsen DP; Elliott S; Tzanetos K; Kulasegaram K
    Perspect Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 9(5):307-313. PubMed ID: 32789664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The neural coding of expected and unexpected monetary performance outcomes: dissociations between active and observational learning.
    Bellebaum C; Jokisch D; Gizewski ER; Forsting M; Daum I
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 227(1):241-51. PubMed ID: 22074898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of prior knowledge in error correction for younger and older adults.
    Sitzman DM; Rhodes MG; Tauber SK; Liceralde VR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2015; 22(4):502-16. PubMed ID: 25558782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of elaborate feedback during practice tests: Costs and benefits of retrieval prompts.
    van den Broek GSE; Segers E; van Rijn H; Takashima A; Verhoeven L
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):588-601. PubMed ID: 30998028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When more is less: feedback effects in perceptual category learning.
    Maddox WT; Love BC; Glass BD; Filoteo JV
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):578-89. PubMed ID: 18455155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sequence Learning Under Uncertainty in Children: Self-Reflection vs. Self-Assertion.
    Lange-Küttner C; Averbeck BB; Hirsch SV; Wießner I; Lamba N
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():127. PubMed ID: 22563324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frontal cortical effects on feedback processing and reinforcement learning: Relation of EEG asymmetry with the feedback-related negativity and behavior.
    Schmid PC; Hackel LM; Jasperse L; Amodio DM
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jan; 55(1):. PubMed ID: 28675507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrophysiological Correlates of Error Monitoring and Feedback Processing in Second Language Learning.
    Bultena S; Danielmeier C; Bekkering H; Lemhöfer K
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():29. PubMed ID: 28194104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.