These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20408044)

  • 1. Does the amount of material to be remembered influence judgements of learning (JOLs)?
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Memory; 2010 Apr; 18(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 20408044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs).
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1376-96. PubMed ID: 22524495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple bases for young and older adults' judgments of learning in multitrial learning.
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):474-83. PubMed ID: 21942899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.
    Sikström S; Jönsson F
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):932-50. PubMed ID: 16262474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
    Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metacognition in prospective memory: are performance predictions accurate?
    Schnitzspahn KM; Zeintl M; Jäger T; Kliegel M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Mar; 65(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 21443326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metacognitive errors contribute to the difficulty in remembering proper names.
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Memory; 2010 Jul; 18(5):522-32. PubMed ID: 20503129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are people with mild cognitive impairment aware of the benefits of errorless learning?
    Akhtar S; Moulin CJ; Bowie PC
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 16(3):329-46. PubMed ID: 16835155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metamemory adjustments over time in adults with and without traumatic brain injury.
    Krause M; Kennedy MR
    Brain Inj; 2009 Nov; 23(12):965-72. PubMed ID: 19831493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of the length of to-be-remembered lists and intervening lists on free recall: a reexamination using overt rehearsal.
    Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1196-210. PubMed ID: 15521798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.
    Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):639-650. PubMed ID: 27987115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.