These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20408732)
1. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Deshpande M; Harper J; Holloway M; Palmer R; Wang R Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2010 Jun; 14(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 20408732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Genetic analysis of chorionic villi specimen in spontaneous abortion using various methods]. Lei Q; Wang Q; Zhou CQ; Chen BJ; Chen Z; Xu YW; Zeng YH Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 19570460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Karyotype analysis of chorionic villi from pregnant women with missed abortion using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification]. Gu Y; Xie JS; Luo FW; Geng Q; Zhang HK; Shen HN; Zhao K; Liu QZ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 44(7):509-13. PubMed ID: 19957550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases. Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. aCGH on chorionic villi mirrors the complexity of fetoplacental mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Filges I; Kang A; Klug V; Wenzel F; Heinimann K; Tercanli S; Miny P Prenat Diagn; 2011 May; 31(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 21351283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of two aneuploidy screening tests for chorionic villus samples: Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Wu T; Zhu Y; Hong L; Lin Q; Chen C; Yang J; Ye L; Huang W; Zeng Y Mol Cell Probes; 2019 Aug; 46():101422. PubMed ID: 31319160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in over 1600 cases using array comparative genomic hybridization as a first line test. Carey L; Scott F; Murphy K; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Leigh D; Robertson R; McLennan A Prenat Diagn; 2014 May; 34(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 24453008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Application of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for rapid detection of aneuploidies and structural chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis]. Zhang J; Hu P; Luo C; Ji Q; Zhou J; Liu A; Ma D; Xu Z Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Feb; 31(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 24510553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis-experience of a large series of rapid testing for aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. Gerdes T; Kirchhoff M; Lind AM; Vestergaard Larsen G; Kjaergaard S Prenat Diagn; 2008 Dec; 28(12):1119-25. PubMed ID: 19003800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dilemmas in Prenatal Chromosomal Diagnosis Revealed Through a Single Center's 30 Years' Experience and 90,000 Cases. Konialis C; Pangalos C Fetal Diagn Ther; 2015; 38(3):218-32. PubMed ID: 25659342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molecular analysis of miscarriage products using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA): alternative to conventional karyotype analysis. Kim JW; Lyu SW; Sung SR; Park JE; Cha DH; Yoon TK; Ko JJ; Shim SH Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Feb; 291(2):347-54. PubMed ID: 25115280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility and limitations of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technique in the detection of cytogenetic abnormalities in products of conception. Saxena D; Agarwal M; Gupta D; Agrawal S; Das V; Phadke SR J Postgrad Med; 2016; 62(4):239-241. PubMed ID: 27763481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MLPA as a screening method of aneuploidy and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements in spontaneous miscarriages. Diego-Alvarez D; Rodriguez de Alba M; Cardero-Merlo R; Diaz-Recasens J; Ayuso C; Ramos C; Lorda-Sanchez I Prenat Diagn; 2007 Aug; 27(8):765-71. PubMed ID: 17546698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid screening for chromosomal aneuploidies using array-MLPA. Yan JB; Xu M; Xiong C; Zhou DW; Ren ZR; Huang Y; Mommersteeg M; van Beuningen R; Wang YT; Liao SX; Zeng F; Wu Y; Zeng YT BMC Med Genet; 2011 May; 12():68. PubMed ID: 21575262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on DNA from Amniotic Fluid and Chorionic Villus Sampling. Patel A Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1885():171-186. PubMed ID: 30506198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective growth of mosaic cells in chromosomal analysis of chorionic villi by conventional karyotyping. Zhang Y; Lei Q; Liu J; Lin M; Luo L; Li T; Wang Q; Zhou C Mol Cell Probes; 2020 Jun; 51():101532. PubMed ID: 32081770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncovering recurrent microdeletion syndromes and subtelomeric deletions/duplications through non-selective application of a MLPA-based extended prenatal panel in routine prenatal diagnosis. Konialis C; Hagnefelt B; Sevastidou S; Karapanou S; Pispili K; Markaki A; Pangalos C Prenat Diagn; 2011 Jun; 31(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 21448863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics. Fruhman G; Van den Veyver IB Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2010 Mar; 37(1):71-85, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20494259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype: a follow-up study of 100 cases supplemented with CGH and MLPA analyses. Schou KV; Kirchhoff M; Nygaard U; Jørgensen C; Sundberg K Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 19953565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]