These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20409043)

  • 1. The effects of presenting imprecise probabilities in intelligence forecasts.
    Dieckmann NF; Mauro R; Slovic P
    Risk Anal; 2010 Jun; 30(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 20409043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving Intelligence Analysis With Decision Science.
    Dhami MK; Mandel DR; Mellers BA; Tetlock PE
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 10(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 26581731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty forecasts improve weather-related decisions and attenuate the effects of forecast error.
    Joslyn SL; LeClerc JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Mar; 18(1):126-40. PubMed ID: 21875244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limitations of acceptability curves for presenting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Groot Koerkamp B; Hunink MG; Stijnen T; Hammitt JK; Kuntz KM; Weinstein MC
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 17409361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of a decision analytic model for posteradication polio risk management.
    Duintjer Tebbens RJ; Pallansch MA; Kew OM; Sutter RW; Bruce Aylward R; Watkins M; Gary H; Alexander J; Jafari H; Cochi SL; Thompson KM
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):855-76. PubMed ID: 18627544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing probabilistic weather forecasts to the worst-case scenario: anchoring effects.
    Joslyn S; Savelli S; Nadav-Greenberg L
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):342-53. PubMed ID: 22039767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Representation, propagation, and decision issues in risk analysis under incomplete probabilistic information.
    Dubois D
    Risk Anal; 2010 Mar; 30(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 20487395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
    Inukai K; Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy.
    Dieckmann NF; Slovic P; Peters EM
    Risk Anal; 2009 Oct; 29(10):1473-88. PubMed ID: 19671102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision making under risk and under ambiguity in Parkinson's disease.
    Delazer M; Sinz H; Zamarian L; Stockner H; Seppi K; Wenning GK; Benke T; Poewe W
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1901-8. PubMed ID: 19428422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of uncertainty forecasts in complex decision tasks and various weather conditions.
    Joslyn SL; Grounds MA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 26479974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the need for restricting the probabilistic analysis in risk assessments to variability.
    Aven T
    Risk Anal; 2010 Mar; 30(3):354-60; author reply 381-4. PubMed ID: 19919552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertain numbers and uncertainty in the selection of input distributions--consequences for a probabilistic risk assessment of contaminated land.
    Sander P; Bergbäck B; Oberg T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1363-75. PubMed ID: 17054537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (p-box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment.
    Karanki DR; Kushwaha HS; Verma AK; Ajit S
    Risk Anal; 2009 May; 29(5):662-75. PubMed ID: 19302279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is guilt 'likely' or 'not certain'? Contrast with previous probabilities determines choice of verbal terms.
    Juanchich M; Teigen KH; Villejoubert G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 20723869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When does information about probability count in choices under risk?
    Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Event-tree analysis with imprecise probabilities.
    You X; Tonon F
    Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):330-44. PubMed ID: 22053780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity.
    Levy I; Snell J; Nelson AJ; Rustichini A; Glimcher PW
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 103(2):1036-47. PubMed ID: 20032238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Words or numbers? Communicating probability in intelligence analysis.
    Dhami MK; Mandel DR
    Am Psychol; 2021 Apr; 76(3):549-560. PubMed ID: 32700939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative theories for clinical decision making.
    Habbema JD
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1984; 32(3-4):172-80. PubMed ID: 6522731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.