These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20410412)
1. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in evaluation of patients without symptoms who have positive stress test results. Halpern EJ; Savage MP; Fischman DL; Levin DC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1257-62. PubMed ID: 20410412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients with chest pain. Ladapo JA; Jaffer FA; Hoffmann U; Thomson CC; Bamberg F; Dec W; Cutler DM; Weinstein MC; Gazelle GS J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 54(25):2409-22. PubMed ID: 20082932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost implications of initial computed tomography angiography as opposed to catheterization in patients with mildly abnormal or equivocal myocardial perfusion scans. Cole JH; Chunn VM; Morrow JA; Buckley RS; Phillips GM J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2007 Jul; 1(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 19083872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic uncertainty and costs associated with current emergency department evaluation of low risk chest pain. Khare RK; Powell ES; Venkatesh AK; Courtney DM Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 7(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 18791408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decision analytic model for evaluation of suspected coronary disease with stress testing and coronary CT angiography. Halpern EJ; Fischman D; Savage MP; Koka AR; DeCaro M; Levin DC Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):577-86. PubMed ID: 20171906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct costs and cost-effectiveness of dual-source computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Dorenkamp M; Bonaventura K; Sohns C; Becker CR; Leber AW Heart; 2012 Mar; 98(6):460-7. PubMed ID: 21846767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The optimal imaging strategy for patients with stable chest pain: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Genders TS; Petersen SE; Pugliese F; Dastidar AG; Fleischmann KE; Nieman K; Hunink MG Ann Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 162(7):474-84. PubMed ID: 25844996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of combined cardiac positron emission tomography and coronary computed tomography angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. Adams GL; Trimble MA; Brosnan RB; Russo CA; Rusband D; Honeycutt EF; Shaw LK; Hurwitz LM; Turkington TG; Hanson MW; Pagnanelli RA; Borges-Neto S Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):593-8. PubMed ID: 18528180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of multidetector computed tomography compared with myocardial perfusion imaging as gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography in asymptomatic firefighters with positive treadmill tests. Budoff MJ; Karwasky R; Ahmadi N; Nasserian C; Pratt F; Stephens J; Chang WW; Flores FR; Rizzo JA; Gunnarsson CL; McKay CR J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 19818321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of a novel indication of computed tomography of the coronary arteries. Powell ES; Patterson BW; Venkatesh AK; Khare RK Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22337217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rationale and design of a randomized trial comparing initial stress echocardiography versus coronary CT angiography in low-to-intermediate risk emergency department patients with chest pain. Levsky JM; Haramati LB; Taub CC; Spevack DM; Menegus MA; Travin MI; Vega S; Lerer R; Brown-Manhertz D; Hirschhorn E; Tobin JN; Garcia MJ Echocardiography; 2014 Jul; 31(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 24372760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion imaging for near-term quality of life, cost and radiation exposure: a prospective multicenter randomized pilot trial. Min JK; Koduru S; Dunning AM; Cole JH; Hines JL; Greenwell D; Biga C; Fanning G; LaBounty TM; Gomez M; Horowitz JM; Hadimitzsky M; Hausleiter J; Callister TQ; Rosanski AR; Shaw LJ; Berman DS; Lin FY J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(4):274-83. PubMed ID: 22732201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography and cardiac stress imaging in the emergency department: a decision analytic model comparing diagnostic strategies for chest pain in patients at low risk of acute coronary syndromes. Priest VL; Scuffham PA; Hachamovitch R; Marwick TH JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 May; 4(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 21565744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of usefulness of exercise testing versus coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Ovrehus KA; Jensen JK; Mickley HF; Munkholm H; Bøttcher M; Bøtker HE; Nørgaard BL Am J Cardiol; 2010 Mar; 105(6):773-9. PubMed ID: 20211318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The pre-test risk stratified cost-effectiveness of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in the detection of significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients otherwise referred to invasive coronary angiography. Kreisz FP; Merlin T; Moss J; Atherton J; Hiller JE; Gericke CA Heart Lung Circ; 2009 Jun; 18(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 19250870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects on costs of frontline diagnostic evaluation in patients suspected of angina: coronary computed tomography angiography vs. conventional ischaemia testing. Nielsen LH; Olsen J; Markenvard J; Jensen JM; Nørgaard BL Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 May; 14(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 22922828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease in an outpatient cardiac CT angiography environment. Budoff MJ; Gopal A; Gul KM; Mao SS; Fischer H; Oudiz RJ Int J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 129(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 17651836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evidence-based application of cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac computed tomography for primary diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease with special attention to disease management programs and the German National Medical Care Guidelines]. Silber S; Richartz BM Herz; 2007 Mar; 32(2):139-58. PubMed ID: 17401756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Mowatt G; Cummins E; Waugh N; Walker S; Cook J; Jia X; Hillis GS; Fraser C Health Technol Assess; 2008 May; 12(17):iii-iv, ix-143. PubMed ID: 18462576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of a novel blood-pool contrast agent in the setting of chest pain evaluation in an emergency department. Espinosa G; Annapragada A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):710-9. PubMed ID: 24059359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]