These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20411316)

  • 41. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
    Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Eyewitness testimony and perceived credibility of youth with mild intellectual disability.
    Peled M; Iarocci G; Connolly DA
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2004 Oct; 48(Pt 7):699-703. PubMed ID: 15357691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
    Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Warmth and competence on the witness stand: implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses.
    Neal TM; Guadagno RE; Eno CA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):488-97. PubMed ID: 23233470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence.
    Hans VP; Kaye DH; Dann BM; Farley EJ; Albertson S
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 20461543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of a physician's use of a diagnostic decision aid on the malpractice verdicts of mock jurors.
    Arkes HR; Shaffer VA; Medow MA
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 18349437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How video image size interacts with evidence strength, defendant emotion, and the defendant-victim relationship to alter perceptions of the defendant.
    Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(4):496-507. PubMed ID: 24715347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence.
    Woody WD; Forrest KD
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 19405020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Memory Errors in Alibi Generation: How an Alibi Can Turn Against Us.
    Crozier WE; Strange D; Loftus EF
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 28165152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Differences in expert witness knowledge: do mock jurors notice and does it matter?
    Parrott CT; Neal TM; Wilson JK; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 25770282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Post-identification feedback to eyewitnesses impairs evaluators' abilities to discriminate between accurate and mistaken testimony.
    Smalarz L; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 24341835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Altruism in social networks: evidence for a 'kinship premium'.
    Curry O; Roberts SG; Dunbar RI
    Br J Psychol; 2013 May; 104(2):283-95. PubMed ID: 23560672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias.
    Patry MW
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 18763443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Judgments of culpability in a filicide scenario.
    Ferguson CJ; Miller-Stratton H; Heinrich E; Fritz S; Smith S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 18158184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Perceptions of familiar and unfamiliar ear- and eyewitnesses.
    Harvey MB; Bruer KC; Price HL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2022; 29(3):395-412. PubMed ID: 35756706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of expertise on memory conformity: a test of informational influence.
    Williamson P; Weber N; Robertson MT
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):607-23. PubMed ID: 24108576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Crime Scene Familiarity: Does it Influence Mock Jurors' Decisions?
    Pica E; Pozzulo J
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2017; 24(5):745-759. PubMed ID: 31983986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
    Crocker CB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. False alibi corroboration: witnesses lie for suspects who seem innocent, whether they like them or not.
    Marion SB; Burke TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 23339667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.