487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20412092)
1. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography.
Makris N; Stamatakis H; Syriopoulos K; Tsiklakis K; van der Stelt PF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):766-71. PubMed ID: 20412092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography.
Pires CA; Bissada NF; Becker JJ; Kanawati A; Landers MA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19673957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appearance, location, course, and morphology of the mandibular incisive canal: an assessment on spiral CT scan.
Jacobs R; Mraiwa N; vanSteenberghe D; Gijbels F; Quirynen M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Sep; 31(5):322-7. PubMed ID: 12203132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Location and Anatomical Characteristics of Mental Foramen, Anterior Loop and Mandibular Incisive Canal Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Panjnoush M; Rabiee ZS; Kheirandish Y
J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Mar; 13(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 27928241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrospective study of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve and the incisive canal using cone beam computed tomography.
Rosa MB; Sotto-Maior BS; Machado Vde C; Francischone CE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):388-92. PubMed ID: 23527339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safe zone for bone harvesting from the interforaminal region of the mandible.
Al-Ani O; Nambiar P; Ha KO; Ngeow WC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():115-21. PubMed ID: 22233422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the relationship between appearances of the lingual foramen on panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Isman O; Kayar S; Surmelioglu D; Ciftci ME; Aktan AM
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):205-211. PubMed ID: 32031095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiographic analysis of the anterior mandible and its anatomical variations using cone-beam computed tomography.
Enderle F; Grill F; Rommel N; Ritschl L; Grandoch A; Wolff KD; Sculean A; Deppe H
Quintessence Int; 2022 Oct; 53(10):874-882. PubMed ID: 35976749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study of the mandibular incisive canal anatomy using cone beam computed tomography.
Kabak SL; Zhuravleva NV; Melnichenko YM; Savrasova NA
Surg Radiol Anat; 2017 Jun; 39(6):647-655. PubMed ID: 27837264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography.
Uchida Y; Noguchi N; Goto M; Yamashita Y; Hanihara T; Takamori H; Sato I; Kawai T; Yosue T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 19304029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between the position of the mental foramen and the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve as determined by cone beam computed tomography combined with mimics.
Chen Z; Chen D; Tang L; Wang F
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 25299797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics of anatomical landmarks in the mandibular interforaminal region: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Parnia F; Moslehifard E; Hafezeqoran A; Mahboub F; Mojaver-Kahnamoui H
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 May; 17(3):e420-5. PubMed ID: 22143718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The prevalence of mandibular incisive nerve canal and to evaluate its average location and dimension in Indian population.
Ramesh AS; Rijesh K; Sharma A; Prakash R; Kumar A; Karthik
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2015 Aug; 7(Suppl 2):S594-6. PubMed ID: 26538925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The dimensions of the mandibular incisive canal and its spatial relationship to various anatomical landmarks of the mandible: a study using cone beam computed tomography.
Apostolakis D; Brown JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 23377056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Mandibular incisive canal by cone beam CT].
Huang H; Liu P; Li X; Pei Z; Yang X; Bai S; Huang Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 31(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 24298798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Gröndahl K; Ekestubbe A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 18783419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of location and dimensions of lingual foramina using limited cone-beam computed tomography.
von Arx T; Matter D; Buser D; Bornstein MM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2777-85. PubMed ID: 21855197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Morphology study of mandibular incisive canal in adults based on cone-beam computed tomography].
Kong N; Yuan H; Miao F; Xie L; Zhu L; Chen N
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 25908188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The mandibular incisive canal and its anatomical relationships: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Pereira-Maciel P; Tavares-de-Sousa E; Oliveira-Sales MA
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 Nov; 20(6):e723-8. PubMed ID: 26449433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of the mandibular landmarks in a pediatric population.
Cantekin K; Sekerci AE; Miloglu O; Buyuk SK
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2014 Mar; 19(2):e136-41. PubMed ID: 24121905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
