These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20412159)

  • 1. Commentary on: Budowle B, Onorato AJ, Callaghan TF, Della Manna A, Gross AM, Guerrieri RA, Luttman JC, McClure DL. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):810-21.
    Gill P; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):265-8; author reply 269-72. PubMed ID: 20412159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework.
    Budowle B; Onorato AJ; Callaghan TF; Della Manna A; Gross AM; Guerrieri RA; Luttman JC; McClure DL
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):810-21. PubMed ID: 19368620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary on: Budowle B, Shea B, Niezgoda S, Chakraborty R. CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations. J Forensic Sci 2001;46:453-489.
    Kornfield IL
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1525. PubMed ID: 16382867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.
    Curran JM; Gill P; Bill MR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15607589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
    Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commentary on: Budowle B, Shea B, Niezgoda S, Chakraborty r. CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations. J Forensic Sci 2001;46:453-489.
    Krane DE; Doom TE; Mueller L; Raymer ML; Shields WM; Thompson WC
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Nov; 49(6):1388-9; author reply 1390-3. PubMed ID: 15568729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?
    Haned H; Pène L; Lobry JR; Dufour AB; Pontier D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20840286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interpretation of low level DNA mixtures.
    Kelly H; Bright JA; Curran J; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 21570375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comment on "A universal strategy to interpret DNA profiles that does not require a definition of low copy number" by Peter Gill and John Buckleton, 2010, Forensic Sci. Int. Genetics 4, 221-227.
    Budowle B; van Daal A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):15. PubMed ID: 20457107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating mixed stains with contributors of different ethnic groups under the NRC-II Recommendation 4.1.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3583-93. PubMed ID: 12436457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a tree diagram to interpret a mixed DNA profile.
    Evett IW; Foreman LA; Lambert JA; Emes A
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 May; 43(3):472-6. PubMed ID: 9608685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Interpretation of DNA profiles for mixed stains].
    Lu DJ; Lu HL; Chen YC
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 18(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 12608297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AmpFlSTR profiler Plus short tandem repeat DNA analysis of casework samples, mixture samples, and nonhuman DNA samples amplified under reduced PCR volume conditions (25 microL).
    Frégeau CJ; Bowen KL; Leclair B; Trudel I; Bishop L; Fourney RM
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1014-34. PubMed ID: 14535664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation and statistical evaluation of multilocus DNA fingerprints in paternity and relationship testing.
    Rysiecki G; Brookfield JF
    Methods Mol Biol; 1998; 98():97-103. PubMed ID: 9664558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculating the weight of evidence in low-template forensic DNA casework.
    Lohmueller KE; Rudin N
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S243-9. PubMed ID: 23082963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles.
    Gill P; Kirkham A; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Mar; 166(2-3):128-38. PubMed ID: 16759831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.