These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20412159)

  • 21. PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Bill M; Gill P; Curran J; Clayton T; Pinchin R; Healy M; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Mar; 148(2-3):181-9. PubMed ID: 15639613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On statistical analysis of forensic DNA: theory, methods and computer programs.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ; Chung YK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):17-23. PubMed ID: 16870375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures.
    Gill P; Brenner CH; Buckleton JS; Carracedo A; Krawczak M; Mayr WR; Morling N; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Weir BS;
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jul; 160(2-3):90-101. PubMed ID: 16750605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Commentary on: Cakir AH, Simşek F, Açik L, Taşdelen B. Distribution of HumTPOX, HumvWA, HumTH01 alleles in a Turkish population sample. J Forensic Sci 2001;46(5): 1257.
    Kalfoglu EA
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jul; 47(4):922; author reply 922. PubMed ID: 12137016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of the AmpliFLP D1S80 PCR Amplification Kit for forensic casework analysis according to TWGDAM guidelines.
    Cosso S; Reynolds R
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 May; 40(3):424-34. PubMed ID: 7782746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Commentary on Rubocki RJ, McCue BJ, Duffy KJ, Shepard KL, Shepard SJ, Wisecarver JL. Natural DNA mixtures generated in fraternal twins in utero. J Forensic Sci 2001;46(1):120-125.
    Brauner P
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(6):1526-7. PubMed ID: 11714179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
    Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of stochastic variation in mixed and unmixed casework and synthetic samples.
    Bright JA; McManus K; Harbison S; Gill P; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 21550327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automated PCR setup for forensic casework samples using the Normalization Wizard and PCR Setup robotic methods.
    Greenspoon SA; Sykes KL; Ban JD; Pollard A; Baisden M; Farr M; Graham N; Collins BL; Green MM; Christenson CC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Dec; 164(2-3):240-8. PubMed ID: 16542806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation of probabilistic genotyping software for use in forensic DNA casework: Definitions and illustrations.
    Haned H; Gill P; Lohmueller K; Inman K; Rudin N
    Sci Justice; 2016 Mar; 56(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 26976468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Commentary on: Coble MD, Butler JM. Characterization of new miniSTR loci to aid analysis of degraded DNA. J Forensic Sci 2005;50:43-53.
    Lederer T; Braunschweiger G
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Mar; 52(2):493; author reply 494. PubMed ID: 17316259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forensic interpretation of Y-chromosomal DNA mixtures.
    Wolf A; Caliebe A; Junge O; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15978347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations.
    Curran JM; Triggs CM; Buckleton J; Weir BS
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):987-95. PubMed ID: 10486951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A validation study for the extraction and analysis of DNA from human nail material and its application to forensic casework.
    Anderson TD; Ross JP; Roby RK; Lee DA; Holland MM
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):1053-6. PubMed ID: 10486958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Commentary on: Barros de Castro IA, Rinzler CM, Rumjanek FD. Allele frequency distributions for twelve STR loci in a Brazilian population. J Forensic Sci 2000;45(4):941.
    Moura-Neto RS; Silva R; Bydlowski SP
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Sep; 46(5):1260. PubMed ID: 11569581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of samples comprising minute amounts of DNA.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; Yoo SY; Sijen T
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 26385713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Commentary on: Authors' response [J Forensic Sci 2009;54(2):501] to Wells' comments [J Forensic Sci 2009;54(2):500] regarding Krane DE, Ford S, Gilder JR, Inman K, Jamieson A, Koppl R, Kornfield IL, Risinger DM, Rudin N, Taylor MS, Thompson WC. Sequential unmasking: a means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation.
    Ostrum B
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Nov; 54(6):1498-9; author reply 1500-1. PubMed ID: 19878427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Forensic DNA and bioinformatics.
    Bianchi L; Liò P
    Brief Bioinform; 2007 Mar; 8(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 17384432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study.
    Greenspoon SA; Schiermeier-Wood L; Jenkins BC
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1263-76. PubMed ID: 26258391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.