434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20412544)
1. Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.
Klang SH; Hammerman A; Liebermann N; Efrat N; Doberne J; Hornberger J
Value Health; 2010; 13(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 20412544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic profile of breast cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective.
Seguí MÁ; Crespo C; Cortés J; Lluch A; Brosa M; Becerra V; Chiavenna SM; Gracia A
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Dec; 14(6):889-99. PubMed ID: 25213317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.
Blohmer JU; Rezai M; Kümmel S; Kühn T; Warm M; Friedrichs K; Benkow A; Valentine WJ; Eiermann W
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22966753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model.
Yang M; Rajan S; Issa AM
Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(20):5163-70. PubMed ID: 22359236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(23):1-57. PubMed ID: 23074401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX® versus current clinical practice from a Dutch cost perspective.
Kip M; Monteban H; Steuten L
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):433-45. PubMed ID: 25872415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic Impact of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in France.
Katz G; Romano O; Foa C; Vataire AL; Chantelard JV; Hervé R; Barletta H; Durieux A; Martin JP; Salmon R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128880. PubMed ID: 26086912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer.
Hall PS; McCabe C; Stein RC; Cameron D
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jan; 104(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 22138097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03).
Kondo M; Hoshi SL; Yamanaka T; Ishiguro H; Toi M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jun; 127(3):739-49. PubMed ID: 21082239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.
Harnan S; Tappenden P; Cooper K; Stevens J; Bessey A; Rafia R; Ward S; Wong R; Stein RC; Brown J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(30):1-328. PubMed ID: 31264581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Oncotype DX on treatment decisions in ER-positive, node-negative breast cancer with histologic correlation.
Biroschak JR; Schwartz GF; Palazzo JP; Toll AD; Brill KL; Jaslow RJ; Lee SY
Breast J; 2013; 19(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 23614365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer?
Asad J; Jacobson AF; Estabrook A; Smith SR; Boolbol SK; Feldman SM; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Twardzik W; Tartter PI
Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):527-9. PubMed ID: 18809056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-utility of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer.
Lamond NW; Skedgel C; Rayson D; Lethbridge L; Younis T
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jun; 133(3):1115-23. PubMed ID: 22361999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the U.K.
Holt S; Bertelli G; Humphreys I; Valentine W; Durrani S; Pudney D; Rolles M; Moe M; Khawaja S; Sharaiha Y; Brinkworth E; Whelan S; Jones S; Bennett H; Phillips CJ
Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(11):2250-8. PubMed ID: 23695023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.
Delea TE; Karnon J; Smith RE; Johnston SR; Brandman J; Sung JC; Gross PE
Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jul; 12(7):374-86. PubMed ID: 16834524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(10):1-234. PubMed ID: 32284770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial experience with the Oncotype DX assay in decision-making for adjuvant therapy of early oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in Hong Kong.
Cheung PS; Tong AC; Leung RC; Kwan WH; Yau TC
Hong Kong Med J; 2014 Oct; 20(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 24948666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.
Loncaster J; Armstrong A; Howell S; Wilson G; Welch R; Chittalia A; Valentine WJ; Bundred NJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28111076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporating Tumor Characteristics to Maximize 21-Gene Assay Utility: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Wang SY; Chen T; Dang W; Mougalian SS; Evans SB; Gross CP
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2019 Jan; 17(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30659128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Budget impact analysis of gene expression tests to aid therapy decisions for breast cancer patients in Germany.
Lux MP; Nabieva N; Hildebrandt T; Rebscher H; Kümmel S; Blohmer JU; Schrauder MG
Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():89-98. PubMed ID: 29128582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
