220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20412938)
1. Prediction of unobserved single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes of Jersey cattle using reference panels and population-based imputation algorithms.
Weigel KA; Van Tassell CP; O'Connell JR; VanRaden PM; Wiggans GR
J Dairy Sci; 2010 May; 93(5):2229-38. PubMed ID: 20412938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imputation of genotypes from different single nucleotide polymorphism panels in dairy cattle.
Druet T; Schrooten C; de Roos AP
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5443-54. PubMed ID: 20965360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.
Mulder HA; Calus MP; Druet T; Schrooten C
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):876-89. PubMed ID: 22281352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle.
Weigel KA; de Los Campos G; Vazquez AI; Rosa GJ; Gianola D; Van Tassell CP
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5423-35. PubMed ID: 20965358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle.
Zhang Z; Druet T
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5487-94. PubMed ID: 20965364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of reduced panel, reference origin, and genetic relationship on imputation of genotypes in Hereford cattle.
Huang Y; Maltecca C; Cassady JP; Alexander LJ; Snelling WM; MacNeil MD
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4203-8. PubMed ID: 22859753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hot topic: performance of bovine high-density genotyping platforms in Holsteins and Jerseys.
Rincon G; Weber KL; Eenennaam AL; Golden BL; Medrano JF
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6116-21. PubMed ID: 22118099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Within- and across-breed imputation of high-density genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from medium- and low-density genotypes.
Berry DP; McClure MC; Mullen MP
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Jun; 131(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 24906026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imputation of ungenotyped parental genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from progeny genotypes.
Berry DP; McParland S; Kearney JF; Sargolzaei M; Mullen MP
Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 24840560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future.
Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jun; 94(6):3202-11. PubMed ID: 21605789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips.
Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of developed low-density genotype panels for imputation to higher density in independent dairy and beef cattle populations.
Judge MM; Kearney JF; McClure MC; Sleator RD; Berry DP
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):949-62. PubMed ID: 27065257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
