These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20413286)

  • 1. FRAP and kinetic modeling in the analysis of nuclear protein dynamics: what do we really know?
    Mueller F; Mazza D; Stasevich TJ; McNally JG
    Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2010 Jun; 22(3):403-11. PubMed ID: 20413286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inference of protein kinetics by stochastic modeling and simulation of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments.
    Rapsomaniki MA; Cinquemani E; Giakoumakis NN; Kotsantis P; Lygeros J; Lygerou Z
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25273108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to study nuclear protein dynamics in living cells.
    van Royen ME; Farla P; Mattern KA; Geverts B; Trapman J; Houtsmuller AB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 464():363-85. PubMed ID: 18951195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring dynamic binding of chromatin proteins in vivo by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Mueller F; Karpova TS; Mazza D; McNally JG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 833():153-76. PubMed ID: 22183594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring dynamics of nuclear proteins by photobleaching.
    Dundr M; Misteli T
    Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2003 May; Chapter 13():Unit 13.5. PubMed ID: 18228420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative interpretation of binding reactions of rapidly diffusing species using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Tsibidis GD
    J Microsc; 2009 Mar; 233(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19250459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamics of the CapG actin-binding protein in the cell nucleus studied by FRAP and FCS.
    Renz M; Langowski J
    Chromosome Res; 2008; 16(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 18461482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using FRAP and mathematical modeling to determine the in vivo kinetics of nuclear proteins.
    Carrero G; McDonald D; Crawford E; de Vries G; Hendzel MJ
    Methods; 2003 Jan; 29(1):14-28. PubMed ID: 12543068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of binding at a single spatially localized cluster of binding sites by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Sprague BL; Müller F; Pego RL; Bungay PM; Stavreva DA; McNally JG
    Biophys J; 2006 Aug; 91(4):1169-91. PubMed ID: 16679358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nuclear proteins: finding and binding target sites in chromatin.
    van Royen ME; Zotter A; Ibrahim SM; Geverts B; Houtsmuller AB
    Chromosome Res; 2011 Jan; 19(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 21181254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of Protein Kinetics Using Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP).
    Giakoumakis NN; Rapsomaniki MA; Lygerou Z
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1563():243-267. PubMed ID: 28324613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-validating FRAP and FCS to quantify the impact of photobleaching on in vivo binding estimates.
    Stasevich TJ; Mueller F; Michelman-Ribeiro A; Rosales T; Knutson JR; McNally JG
    Biophys J; 2010 Nov; 99(9):3093-101. PubMed ID: 21044608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of dynamic protein binding to chromatin in vivo, using photobleaching microscopy.
    Phair RD; Gorski SA; Misteli T
    Methods Enzymol; 2004; 375():393-414. PubMed ID: 14870680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of Kinetic Models by a Combination of Microirradiation and Fluorescence Photobleaching.
    Lengert L; Lengert N; Drossel B; Cardoso MC; Muster B; Nowak D; Rapp A
    Biophys J; 2015 Oct; 109(8):1551-64. PubMed ID: 26488646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching: application to nuclear proteins.
    Houtsmuller AB
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2005; 95():177-99. PubMed ID: 16080269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of binding mechanisms of nuclear proteins using confocal scanning laser microscopy and FRAP.
    Tsibidis GD; Ripoll J
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug; 253(4):755-68. PubMed ID: 18538796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Considering discrete protein pools when measuring the dynamics of nuclear membrane proteins.
    Zuleger N; Kelly DA; Schirmer EC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1042():275-98. PubMed ID: 23980015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anomalous photobleaching in fluorescence recovery after photobleaching measurements due to excitation saturation--a case study for fluorescein.
    Braeckmans K; Stubbe BG; Remaut K; Demeester J; De Smedt SC
    J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(4):044013. PubMed ID: 16965170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for a common mode of transcription factor interaction with chromatin as revealed by improved quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Mueller F; Wach P; McNally JG
    Biophys J; 2008 Apr; 94(8):3323-39. PubMed ID: 18199661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative FRAP in analysis of molecular binding dynamics in vivo.
    McNally JG
    Methods Cell Biol; 2008; 85():329-51. PubMed ID: 18155469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.