BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20413375)

  • 1. It's brief but is it better? An evaluation of the Brief Implicit Association Test.
    Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 20413375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Being on the lookout for validity: comment on Sriram and Greenwald (2009).
    Friese M; Fiedler K
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 20178956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Brief Implicit Association Test.
    Sriram N; Greenwald AG
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(4):283-94. PubMed ID: 19439401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No measure is perfect, but some measures can be quite useful.
    Greenwald AG; Sriram N
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 20413376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: the Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF).
    Rothermund K; Teige-Mocigemba S; Gast A; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 18609400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):94-106. PubMed ID: 11392986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing fluency as a predictor of salience asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test.
    Chang BP; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2030-54. PubMed ID: 19253092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What does the implicit association test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs.
    Gawronski B
    Exp Psychol; 2002; 49(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 12152361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Brief Death Implicit Association Test: Scoring recommendations, reliability, validity, and comparisons with the Death Implicit Association Test.
    Millner AJ; Coppersmith DDL; Teachman BA; Nock MK
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Oct; 30(10):1356-1366. PubMed ID: 29781668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the implicit association test: comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004).
    Greenwald AG; Nosek BA; Banaji MR; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):420-5; author reply 426-30. PubMed ID: 16131272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When old and frail is not the same: dissociating category and stimulus effects in four implicit attitude measurement methods.
    Gast A; Rothermund K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):479-98. PubMed ID: 19606404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test.
    Steffens MC; Plewe I
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 11392980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the Implicit Association Test: the ReAL model for the IAT.
    Meissner F; Rothermund K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Jan; 104(1):45-69. PubMed ID: 23148698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to Set Focal Categories for Brief Implicit Association Test? "Good" Is Good, "Bad" Is Not So Good.
    Shi Y; Cai H; Shen YA; Yang J
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():38. PubMed ID: 26869948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Englert C; Brand R; Kissler J
    BMC Neurosci; 2016 May; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27142046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting alcohol use with a recoding-free variant of the Implicit Association Test.
    Houben K; Rothermund K; Wiers RW
    Addict Behav; 2009 May; 34(5):487-9. PubMed ID: 19162409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures.
    Bar-Anan Y; Nosek BA
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):668-88. PubMed ID: 24234338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Underlying processes in the implicit association test: dissociating salience from associations.
    Rothermund K; Wentura D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Jun; 133(2):139-65. PubMed ID: 15149248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminating between the effects of valence and salience in the Implicit Association Test.
    Chang BP; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Nov; 64(11):2251-75. PubMed ID: 21722058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of a brief implicit association test of stigma: schizophrenia and dangerousness.
    Denenny D; Bentley E; Schiffman J
    J Ment Health; 2014 Oct; 23(5):246-50. PubMed ID: 25222367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.