These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20413375)

  • 21. Validation of a brief implicit association test of stigma: schizophrenia and dangerousness.
    Denenny D; Bentley E; Schiffman J
    J Ment Health; 2014 Oct; 23(5):246-50. PubMed ID: 25222367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of recoding in implicit social cognition: Investigating the scope and interpretation of the ReAL model for the implicit association test.
    Calanchini J; Meissner F; Klauer KC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250068. PubMed ID: 33878122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An attitudinal study of responses to a range of dermatological conditions using the implicit association test.
    Grandfield TA; Thompson AR; Turpin G
    J Health Psychol; 2005 Nov; 10(6):821-9. PubMed ID: 16176959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does the compatibility effect in the race Implicit Association Test reflect familiarity or affect?
    Kinoshita S; Peek-O'Leary M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):442-52. PubMed ID: 16235627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: personalizing the IAT.
    Olson MA; Fazio RH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 May; 86(5):653-67. PubMed ID: 15161392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of explicit categorization in the Implicit Association Test.
    Yamaguchi M; Beattie G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 May; 149(5):809-827. PubMed ID: 31497977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How do stereotypes influence choice?
    Chaxel AS
    Psychol Sci; 2015 May; 26(5):641-5. PubMed ID: 25749702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Advice-taking as an unobtrusive measure of prejudice.
    Webb TL
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):953-63. PubMed ID: 21681626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The sorting paired features task: a measure of association strengths.
    Bar-Anan Y; Nosek BA; Vianello M
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(5):329-43. PubMed ID: 19447749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A threat in the computer: the race implicit association test as a stereotype threat experience.
    Frantz CM; Cuddy AJ; Burnett M; Ray H; Hart A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Dec; 30(12):1611-24. PubMed ID: 15536243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Single-attribute implicit association tests (SA-IAT) for the assessment of unipolar constructs. The case of sociosexuality.
    Penke L; Eichstaedt J; Asendorpf JB
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 17176660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Proactive control of implicit bias: A theoretical model and implications for behavior change.
    Amodio DM; Swencionis JK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Aug; 115(2):255-275. PubMed ID: 30024242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior.
    Amodio DM; Devine PG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Oct; 91(4):652-61. PubMed ID: 17014291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Framing discrimination: effects of inclusion versus exclusion mind-sets on stereotypic judgments.
    Hugenberg K; Bodenhausen GV; McLain M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1020-31. PubMed ID: 17144762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: new evidence for a task-set switching account of the implicit association test effect.
    Klauer KC; Mierke J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Feb; 31(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 15619593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A test of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the alcohol-IAT.
    Houben K; Wiers RW
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 17176661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attitudinal and non-attitudinal components of IAT performance.
    Calanchini J; Sherman JW; Klauer KC; Lai CK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1285-96. PubMed ID: 24986841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stimulus-response compatibility tests of implicit preference for food and body image to identify people at risk for disordered eating: a validation study.
    Khan S; Petróczi A
    Eat Behav; 2015 Jan; 16():54-63. PubMed ID: 25464068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Category and stereotype activation revisited.
    Akrami N; Ekehammar B; Araya T
    Scand J Psychol; 2006 Dec; 47(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 17107500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gaining control over responses to implicit attitude tests: Implementation intentions engender fast responses on attitude-incongruent trials.
    Webb TL; Sheeran P; Pepper J
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):13-32. PubMed ID: 22435844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.