These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20413450)

  • 1. Automatic top-down processing explains common left occipito-temporal responses to visual words and objects.
    Kherif F; Josse G; Price CJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2011 Jan; 21(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 20413450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading without the left ventral occipito-temporal cortex.
    Seghier ML; Neufeld NH; Zeidman P; Leff AP; Mechelli A; Nagendran A; Riddoch JM; Humphreys GW; Price CJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3621-35. PubMed ID: 23017598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word or word-like? Dissociating orthographic typicality from lexicality in the left occipito-temporal cortex.
    Woollams AM; Silani G; Okada K; Patterson K; Price CJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 20429854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Top-down and bottom-up influences on the left ventral occipito-temporal cortex during visual word recognition: an analysis of effective connectivity.
    Schurz M; Kronbichler M; Crone J; Richlan F; Klackl J; Wimmer H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1668-80. PubMed ID: 23670980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the functional neuroanatomy of visual word processing: effects of case and letter deviance.
    Kronbichler M; Klackl J; Richlan F; Schurz M; Staffen W; Ladurner G; Wimmer H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 18476755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decoding levels of representation in reading: A representational similarity approach.
    Fischer-Baum S; Bruggemann D; Gallego IF; Li DSP; Tamez ER
    Cortex; 2017 May; 90():88-102. PubMed ID: 28384482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explaining left lateralization for words in the ventral occipitotemporal cortex.
    Seghier ML; Price CJ
    J Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 31(41):14745-53. PubMed ID: 21994390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential activation of object-selective visual areas by passive viewing of pictures and words.
    Reinholz J; Pollmann S
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 15921900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three distinct ventral occipitotemporal regions for reading and object naming.
    Moore CJ; Price CJ
    Neuroimage; 1999 Aug; 10(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 10417250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Separate processing of texture and form in the ventral stream: evidence from FMRI and visual agnosia.
    Cavina-Pratesi C; Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Milner AD
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Feb; 20(2):433-46. PubMed ID: 19478035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional specialization and dynamic resource allocation in visual cortex.
    Plomp G; Leeuwen Cv; Ioannides AA
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Jan; 31(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19621367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The left ventral occipito-temporal response to words depends on language lateralization but not on visual familiarity.
    Cai Q; Paulignan Y; Brysbaert M; Ibarrola D; Nazir TA
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 May; 20(5):1153-63. PubMed ID: 19684250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of colour and sound on neuronal activation during visual object naming.
    Hocking J; Price CJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1241(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 18789907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dysfunctional visual word form processing in progressive alexia.
    Wilson SM; Rising K; Stib MT; Rapcsak SZ; Beeson PM
    Brain; 2013 Apr; 136(Pt 4):1260-73. PubMed ID: 23471694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex.
    Rossion B; Joyce CA; Cottrell GW; Tarr MJ
    Neuroimage; 2003 Nov; 20(3):1609-24. PubMed ID: 14642472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of lexical status and orthographic similarity on the multi-voxel response of the visual word form area.
    Baeck A; Kravitz D; Baker C; Op de Beeck HP
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 111():321-328. PubMed ID: 25665965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural substrates for visual pattern recognition learning in Igo.
    Itoh K; Kitamura H; Fujii Y; Nakada T
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():162-73. PubMed ID: 18621033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural representations of visual words and objects: a functional MRI study on the modularity of reading and object processing.
    Borowsky R; Esopenko C; Cummine J; Sarty GE
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17929158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A robust index of lexical representation in the left occipito-temporal cortex as evidenced by EEG responses to fast periodic visual stimulation.
    Lochy A; Van Belle G; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 25448857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.