These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20413707)

  • 1. Measuring natural selection on genotypes and phenotypes in the wild.
    Linnen CR; Hoekstra HE
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():155-68. PubMed ID: 20413707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discriminating selection on lateral plate phenotype and its underlying gene, Ectodysplasin, in threespine stickleback.
    Rennison DJ; Heilbron K; Barrett RD; Schluter D
    Am Nat; 2015 Jan; 185(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 25560560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Allele frequencies and selection coefficients in locally adapted populations.
    Sibly RM; Curnow RN
    J Theor Biol; 2023 May; 565():111463. PubMed ID: 36914112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural selection on a major armor gene in threespine stickleback.
    Barrett RD; Rogers SM; Schluter D
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):255-7. PubMed ID: 18755942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linking a mutation to survival in wild mice.
    Barrett RDH; Laurent S; Mallarino R; Pfeifer SP; Xu CCY; Foll M; Wakamatsu K; Duke-Cohan JS; Jensen JD; Hoekstra HE
    Science; 2019 Feb; 363(6426):499-504. PubMed ID: 30705186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptation from standing genetic variation.
    Barrett RD; Schluter D
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jan; 23(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18006185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The oligogenic view of adaptation.
    Bell G
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():139-44. PubMed ID: 19667015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation.
    Colautti RI; Lau JA
    Mol Ecol; 2015 May; 24(9):1999-2017. PubMed ID: 25891044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why are estimates of the strength and direction of natural selection from wild populations not congruent with observed rates of phenotypic change?
    Brookfield JF
    Bioessays; 2016 Sep; 38(9):927-34. PubMed ID: 27401716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating evolutionary and functional approaches to infer adaptation at specific loci.
    Storz JF; Wheat CW
    Evolution; 2010 Sep; 64(9):2489-509. PubMed ID: 20500215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How can we estimate natural selection on endocrine traits? Lessons from evolutionary biology.
    Bonier F; Martin PR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Nov; 283(1843):. PubMed ID: 27881753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genome-wide analysis of allele frequency change in sunflower crop-wild hybrid populations evolving under natural conditions.
    Corbi J; Baack EJ; Dechaine JM; Seiler G; Burke JM
    Mol Ecol; 2018 Jan; 27(1):233-247. PubMed ID: 28612961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Natural selection drives altitudinal divergence at the albumin locus in deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus.
    Storz JF; Dubach JM
    Evolution; 2004 Jun; 58(6):1342-52. PubMed ID: 15266982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strong and consistent natural selection associated with armour reduction in sticklebacks.
    LE Rouzic A; Østbye K; Klepaker TO; Hansen TF; Bernatchez L; Schluter D; Vøllestad LA
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Jun; 20(12):2483-93. PubMed ID: 21443674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antagonistic versus nonantagonistic models of balancing selection: characterizing the relative timescales and hitchhiking effects of partial selective sweeps.
    Connallon T; Clark AG
    Evolution; 2013 Mar; 67(3):908-17. PubMed ID: 23461340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inference from the stationary distribution of allele frequencies in a family of Wright-Fisher models with two levels of genetic variability.
    Ferguson JM; Buzbas EO
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Jul; 122():78-87. PubMed ID: 29574050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative roles of mutation and selection in the maintenance of genetic variability.
    Nei M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1988 Jul; 319(1196):615-29. PubMed ID: 2905496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A gene with major phenotypic effects as a target for selection vs. homogenizing gene flow.
    Raeymaekers JA; Konijnendijk N; Larmuseau MH; Hellemans B; De Meester L; Volckaert FA
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jan; 23(1):162-81. PubMed ID: 24192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maintenance of a genetic polymorphism with disruptive natural selection in stickleback.
    Marchinko KB; Matthews B; Arnegard ME; Rogers SM; Schluter D
    Curr Biol; 2014 Jun; 24(11):1289-92. PubMed ID: 24856211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bigger Is Fitter? Quantitative Genetic Decomposition of Selection Reveals an Adaptive Evolutionary Decline of Body Mass in a Wild Rodent Population.
    Bonnet T; Wandeler P; Camenisch G; Postma E
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):e1002592. PubMed ID: 28125583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.