These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20414265)

  • 1. The weight of evidence.
    Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7292):1103-4. PubMed ID: 20414265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. America pushes to overhaul chemical safety law.
    Borrell B
    Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7281):599. PubMed ID: 20130623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Streamlined chemical tests rebuffed.
    Gilbert N
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rethink how chemical hazards are tested.
    Warner JC; Ludwig JK
    Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7616):269-70. PubMed ID: 27535519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Handle us with care.
    Hay A
    Nature; 1979 Jul; 280(5717):8-9. PubMed ID: 15305576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Data gaps threaten chemical safety law.
    Gilbert N
    Nature; 2011 Jul; 475(7355):150-1. PubMed ID: 21753825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crucial data on REACH not disclosed.
    Gilbert N
    Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7292):1116-7. PubMed ID: 20414283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toxicology: The big test for bisphenol A.
    Borrell B
    Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7292):1122-4. PubMed ID: 20414285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulatory policy. Congress moves toward strengthening EPA's hand on chemical safety.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5977):417. PubMed ID: 20413468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chemical-safety costs uncertain.
    Gilbert N
    Nature; 2009 Aug; 460(7259):1065. PubMed ID: 19713901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time runs short for opponents of chemical-testing rules.
    Murphy G
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6946):241. PubMed ID: 12867944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deal on toxicity law fails to appease.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7067):406. PubMed ID: 16306952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Putting chemicals on a path to better risk assessment.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5941):694-5. PubMed ID: 19661414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SIDS reprotoxicity screening test update: testing strategies and use.
    Gelbke HP; Fleig H; Meder M;
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Apr; 39(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 15041141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new wave of chemical regulations just ahead?
    Service RF
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5941):692-3. PubMed ID: 19661413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cradle-to-grave management.
    Natarajan P; Tsvetkova J; Webber T
    Occup Health Saf; 2007 Jan; 76(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 17263140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. European Commission responds to chemical testing story.
    English M
    Nature; 2010 May; 465(7297):420. PubMed ID: 20505708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Food and Drug Administration proposed testing guidelines for reproduction studies. Revision Committee. FDA Guidelines for Developmental Toxicity and Reproduction, Food and Drug Administration.
    Collins TF; Sprando RL; Shackelford ME; Hansen DK; Welsh JJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Aug; 30(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 10464044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toxic dilemmas.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2007 Nov; 318(5854):1217. PubMed ID: 18033852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contact lenses in the chemical industry.
    Blais BR
    J Occup Med; 1994 Jul; 36(7):706, 708. PubMed ID: 7931733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.