These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20415238)

  • 1. [Eliciting preferences for mammography: using a discrete choice experiment approach].
    Taguchi R; Yamazaki Y; Nakayama K
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2010 Feb; 57(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 20415238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country.
    Mangham LJ; Hanson K; McPake B
    Health Policy Plan; 2009 Mar; 24(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 19112071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization.
    Nayaradou M; Berchi C; Dejardin O; Launoy G
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19692710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: one strategy fits all? An investigation of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment.
    Kimman ML; Dellaert BG; Boersma LJ; Lambin P; Dirksen CD
    Acta Oncol; 2010 Apr; 49(3):328-37. PubMed ID: 20148645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40-49 years.
    Ohnuki K; Kuriyama S; Shoji N; Nishino Y; Tsuji I; Ohuchi N
    Cancer Sci; 2006 Nov; 97(11):1242-7. PubMed ID: 16918992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of parents and pediatric anesthesiologists' preferences for attributes of child daycase surgery: a discrete choice experiment.
    Gidman W; Elliott R; Payne K; Meakin GH; Moore J
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2007 Nov; 17(11):1043-52. PubMed ID: 17897269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women's anxieties caused by false positives in mammography screening: a contingent valuation survey.
    Yasunaga H; Ide H; Imamura T; Ohe K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jan; 101(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16821083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 'Irrational' stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation.
    Miguel FS; Ryan M; Amaya-Amaya M
    Health Econ; 2005 Mar; 14(3):307-22. PubMed ID: 15386664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Richardson JL; Mondrus GT; Danley K; Deapen D; Mack T
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jan; 5(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8770470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast pain and service satisfaction during digital mammography.
    Wiratkapun C; Lertsithichai P; Wibulpolprasert B; Leelaswattanakul M; Detakarat J; Jungjai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Nov; 89(11):1864-73. PubMed ID: 17205867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Characteristics of screening-detected breast cancer and trends in its therapy].
    Taguchi T; Shiba E; Takai S; Taguchi T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Aug; 25(10):1493-8. PubMed ID: 9725039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recruiting older women for screening mammography.
    Halabi S; Vogel VG; Bondy ML; Vernon SW
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1993; 17(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 8402722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determinants of the demand for breast cancer screening among women veterans in the United States.
    Lairson DR; Chan W; Newmark GR
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Oct; 61(7):1608-17. PubMed ID: 16005790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Balancing the benefits and risks of drug treatment: a stated-preference, discrete choice experiment with patients with psoriasis.
    Seston EM; Ashcroft DM; Griffiths CE
    Arch Dermatol; 2007 Sep; 143(9):1175-9. PubMed ID: 17875880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer risk assessment in a mammography screening program and participation in the IBIS-II chemoprevention trial.
    Loehberg CR; Jud SM; Haeberle L; Heusinger K; Dilbat G; Hein A; Rauh C; Dall P; Rix N; Heinrich S; Buchholz S; Lex B; Reichler B; Adamietz B; Schulz-Wendtland R; Beckmann MW; Fasching PA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 May; 121(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 20306293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Satisfaction of women attending the Manitoba breast screening program.
    Decker KM; Harrison M; Tate RB
    Prev Med; 1999 Jul; 29(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 10419795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography with breast cushions.
    Dibble SL; Israel J; Nussey B; Sayre JW; Brenner RJ; Sickles EA
    Womens Health Issues; 2005; 15(2):55-63. PubMed ID: 15767195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting the axiom of completeness in health care.
    Ryan M; San Miguel F
    Health Econ; 2003 Apr; 12(4):295-307. PubMed ID: 12652516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening behaviors and long-term compliance with mammography guidelines in a breast cancer screening program.
    Weinberg AD; Cooper HP; Lane M; Kripalani S
    Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 9037339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast cancer screening in relation to access to health services.
    Facione NC
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1999 May; 26(4):689-96. PubMed ID: 10337647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.