These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20416433)

  • 1. Effects of four instruments on coronal pre-enlargement by using cone beam computed tomography.
    Sanfelice CM; da Costa FB; Reis Só MV; Vier-Pelisser F; Souza Bier CA; Grecca FS
    J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):858-61. PubMed ID: 20416433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative assessment of the effects of Gates-Glidden, Largo, LA-Axxess, and New Brazilian Drill CPdrill on coronal pre-enlargement: cone-beam computed tomographic analysis.
    Flores CB; Montagner F; Gomes BP; Dotto GN; da Silva Schmitz M
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 24666914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.
    Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the effects of TripleGates and Gates-Glidden burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal area by using cone beam computed tomography.
    Sousa K; Andrade-Junior CV; Silva JM; Duarte MA; De-Deus G; Silva EJ
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 26018308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Gates-Glidden, LA Axxess and orifice shaper burs on the cervical dentin thickness and root canal area of mandibular molars.
    Duarte MA; Bernardes RA; Ordinola-Zapata R; Vasconcelos BC; Bramante CM; Moraes IG
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 21519644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The risk of furcal perforation in mandibular molars using Gates-Glidden drills with anticurvature pressure.
    Wu MK; van der Sluis LW; Wesselink PR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 15716849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Root canal area increase promoted by the EndoSequence and ProTaper systems: comparison by computed tomography.
    Bernardes RA; Rocha EA; Duarte MA; Vivan RR; de Moraes IG; Bramante AS; de Azevedo JR
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1179-82. PubMed ID: 20630294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Volumetric Analysis and Comparison of Dentin Structure Loss after Retrieval of Separated Instrument by Using Ultrasonic EMS and ProUltra Tips.
    Garg H; Grewal MS
    J Endod; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1693-1698. PubMed ID: 27637461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Residual dentin thickness in mesial roots of mandibular molars prepared with Lightspeed rotary instruments and Gates-Glidden reamers.
    Zuckerman O; Katz A; Pilo R; Tamse A; Fuss Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Sep; 96(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 12973293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study.
    Paqué F; Balmer M; Attin T; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 20307747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canal transportation and centring ability of RaCe rotary instruments.
    Pasternak-Júnior B; Sousa-Neto MD; Silva RG
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jun; 42(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 19298575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the apical third of curved roots after mechanical preparation with different automated systems.
    Oliveira CA; Meurer MI; Pascoalato C; Silva SR
    Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 20126905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentine removal in the coronal portion of root canals following two preparation techniques.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Falanga A; Di Giuseppe IL; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    Int Endod J; 2007 Nov; 40(11):852-8. PubMed ID: 17697107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
    Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Canal transportation after root canal instrumentation: a comparative study with computed tomography.
    Hartmann MS; Barletta FB; Camargo Fontanella VR; Vanni JR
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):962-5. PubMed ID: 17878083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Master file size and apical transportation in severely curved root canals.
    Moradi S; Disfani R; Baziar H; Daneshvar F; Jafarzadeh H
    N Z Dent J; 2014 Dec; 110(4):126-9. PubMed ID: 25597191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
    Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a rotary instrumentation method for C-shaped canals with micro-computed tomography.
    Cheung LH; Cheung GS
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1233-8. PubMed ID: 18793928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Sonntag D; Ott M; Kook K; Stachniss V
    Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17697248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.