BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20416553)

  • 1. Bone-cement interfacial behaviour under mixed mode loading conditions.
    Wang JY; Tozzi G; Chen J; Contal F; Lupton C; Tong J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Jul; 3(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 20416553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Mocarski R; Damron LA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Nov; 19(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 11781018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mixed-mode loading of the cement-bone interface: a finite element study.
    Waanders D; Janssen D; Bertoldi K; Mann KA; Verdonschot N
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Feb; 14(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 21170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D real-time micromechanical compressive behaviour of bone-cement interface: experimental and finite element studies.
    Tozzi G; Zhang QH; Tong J
    J Biomech; 2012 Jan; 45(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 22055427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15336925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-yield and post-yield shear behavior of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1998 May; 16(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 9671933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mixed-mode fracture toughness of the cobalt-chromium alloy/polymethylmethacrylate cement interface.
    Mann KA; Bhashyam S
    J Orthop Res; 1999 May; 17(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 10376719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis.
    Placido E; Meira JB; Lima RG; Muench A; de Souza RM; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1086-92. PubMed ID: 17123595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixed-mode failure strength of implant-cement interface specimens with varying surface roughness.
    Zelle J; Janssen D; Peeters S; Brouwer C; Verdonschot N
    J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(4):780-3. PubMed ID: 21074772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Augmentation of acrylic bone cement with multiwall carbon nanotubes.
    Marrs B; Andrews R; Rantell T; Pienkowski D
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 May; 77(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 16392130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness.
    Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 15961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Charnley hip neck-angle inclination on the stresses at stem/cement and bone/cement interfaces.
    Zaki M; Saad F; Al-Ebiary MN
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 12652035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of vertebral cancellous bone augmented with compliant PMMA under dynamic loads.
    Boger A; Bohner M; Heini P; Schwieger K; Schneider E
    Acta Biomater; 2008 Nov; 4(6):1688-93. PubMed ID: 18678533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical strength of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement-human bone interfaces.
    Kusleika R; Stupp SI
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 6863348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterisation of a metallic foam-cement composite under selected loading conditions.
    Tozzi G; Zhang QH; Lupton C; Tong J; Guillen T; Ohrndorf A; Christ HJ
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2509-18. PubMed ID: 23846838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of the optimum loading of an antibiotic powder in an acrylic bone cement: gentamicin sulfate in SmartSet HV.
    Lewis G; Janna S
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 16929440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical investigation of macro- and micro-mechanics of a ceramic veneer bonded with various cement thicknesses using the typical and submodeling finite element approaches.
    Liu HL; Lin CL; Sun MT; Chang YH
    J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 19084316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.