These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2041658)

  • 1. Revision arthroplasty facilitated by ultrasonic tool cement removal. Part I: In vitro evaluation.
    Caillouette JT; Gorab RS; Klapper RC; Anzel SH
    Orthop Rev; 1991 Apr; 20(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 2041658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revision arthroplasty facilitated by ultrasonic tool cement removal. Part II: Histologic analysis of endosteal bone after cement removal.
    Caillouette JT; Gorab RS; Klapper RC; Anzel SH
    Orthop Rev; 1991 May; 20(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 2067878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revision total hip arthroplasty using ultrasonically driven tools. A clinical evaluation.
    Gardiner R; Hozack WJ; Nelson C; Keating EM
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Oct; 8(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 8245997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasonic technology in revision joint arthroplasty.
    Klapper RC; Caillouette JT; Callaghan JJ; Hozack WJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):147-54. PubMed ID: 1446431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of ultrasonic tools in revision arthroplasty procedures.
    Klapper RC; Caillouette JT
    Contemp Orthop; 1990 Mar; 20(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10148050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histological findings of the femoral bone after cement removal in hip revision. An experimental study of cadaver femurs with two different cement removal procedures.
    Porsch M; Schmidt J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 12743715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy analysis of emissions from cement when using ultrasonically driven tools.
    Shewale SB; Briggs RD
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):647-50. PubMed ID: 16263610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation system for removal of distal femoral bone cement in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Akiyama H; Kawanabe K; Goto K; Ohnishi E; Nakamura T
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 17400101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision arthroplasty facilitated by ultrasonic tool cement removal. An evaluation of whole bone strength in a canine model.
    Callaghan JJ; Elder SH; Stranne SK; Fulghum CF; Seaber AV; Myers BS
    J Arthroplasty; 1992 Dec; 7(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 1479368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Work-in-progress #1. The lithotriptor and its potential use in the revision of total hip arthroplasty.
    Karpman RR; Magee FP; Gruen TW; Mobley T
    Orthop Rev; 1987 Jan; 16(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 3453956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total hip revision arthroplasty. Prosthesis and cement removal techniques.
    Gray FB
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 1570143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
    Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [An evaluation of the methods used for removal of components and cement in revision hip arthroplasty].
    Erdemli B
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2004; 38(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 15347918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Would revision arthroplasty be facilitated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? An evaluation including whole bone strength in dogs.
    Stranne SK; Callaghan JJ; Cocks FH; Weinerth JL; Seaber AV; Myers BS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Feb; (287):252-8. PubMed ID: 8448953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Techniques of extraction of well-fixed cemented and cementless implants in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Pierson JL; Jasty M; Harris WH
    Orthop Rev; 1993 Aug; 22(8):904-16. PubMed ID: 8265229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femoral cement removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. A biomechanical analysis.
    Dennis DA; Dingman CA; Meglan DA; O'Leary JF; Mallory TH; Berme N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Jul; (220):142-7. PubMed ID: 3594984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of bonding of the cement-metal interface of a total hip femoral component using ultrasound.
    Davies JP; Tse MK; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1995 May; 13(3):335-8. PubMed ID: 7602394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.