These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Role of intrinsic search cues in the formation of consumer preferences and choice for pork chops. Verbeke W; De Smet S; Vackier I; Van Oeckel MJ; Warnants N; Van Kenhove P Meat Sci; 2005 Feb; 69(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 22062827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumer preferences for pork chops in five Canadian provinces. Ngapo TM Meat Sci; 2017 Jul; 129():102-110. PubMed ID: 28268205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of meat appearance on consumer preferences for pork chops in Greece and Cyprus. Fortomaris P; Arsenos G; Georgiadis M; Banos G; Stamataris C; Zygoyiannis D Meat Sci; 2006 Apr; 72(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 22061881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops. Rincker PJ; Killefer J; Ellis M; Brewer MS; McKeith FK J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):730-7. PubMed ID: 18156359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Pork choice. Ngapo TM; Rubio Lozano MS; Braña Varela D Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():27-35. PubMed ID: 28863351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do all the consumers accept marbling in the same way? The relationship between eating and visual acceptability of pork with different intramuscular fat content. Font-i-Furnols M; Tous N; Esteve-Garcia E; Gispert M Meat Sci; 2012 Aug; 91(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 22429803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Verbeke W; Pérez-Cueto FJ; Barcellos MD; Krystallis A; Grunert KG Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20374787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consumers' expected quality and intention to purchase high quality pork meat. Papanagiotou P; Tzimitra-Kalogianni I; Melfou K Meat Sci; 2013 Mar; 93(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 23273449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of cluster analysis and preference mapping to evaluate consumer acceptability of choice and select bovine M. longissimus lumborum steaks cooked to various end-point temperatures. Schmidt TB; Schilling MW; Behrends JM; Battula V; Jackson V; Sekhon RK; Lawrence TE Meat Sci; 2010 Jan; 84(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 20374753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Beef choice. Ngapo TM; Braña Varela D; Rubio Lozano MS Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():34-43. PubMed ID: 28750333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of pre-sliced pork and Turkey ham qualities based on image colour and textural features and their relationships with consumer responses. Iqbal A; Valous NA; Mendoza F; Sun DW; Allen P Meat Sci; 2010 Mar; 84(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 20374810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of feeding distillers dried grains with solubles, high-protein distillers dried grains, and corn germ to growing-finishing pigs on pig performance, carcass quality, and the palatability of pork. Widmer MR; McGinnis LM; Wulf DM; Stein HH J Anim Sci; 2008 Aug; 86(8):1819-31. PubMed ID: 18375667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of supplemental manganese on performance of growing-finishing pigs and pork quality during retail display. Sawyer JT; Tittor AW; Apple JK; Morgan JB; Maxwell CV; Rakes LK; Fakler TM J Anim Sci; 2007 Apr; 85(4):1046-53. PubMed ID: 17178808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consumer visual preference and value for beef steaks differing in marbling level and color. Killinger KM; Calkins CR; Umberger WJ; Feuz DM; Eskridge KM J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3288-93. PubMed ID: 15542475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of supplemental iron on finishing swine performance, carcass characteristics, and pork quality during retail display. Apple JK; Wallis-Phelps WA; Maxwell CV; Rakes LK; Sawyer JT; Hutchison S; Fakler TM J Anim Sci; 2007 Mar; 85(3):737-45. PubMed ID: 17085730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping differences in consumer perception of sharp cheddar cheese in the United States. Drake SL; Lopetcharat K; Clark S; Kwak HS; Lee SY; Drake MA J Food Sci; 2009 Aug; 74(6):S276-85. PubMed ID: 19723234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between consumer ranking of lamb colour and objective measures of colour. Khliji S; van de Ven R; Lamb TA; Lanza M; Hopkins DL Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 20374889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]