These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20416840)
41. Effect of visual marbling on sensory properties and quality traits of pork loin. Cannata S; Engle TE; Moeller SJ; Zerby HN; Radunz AE; Green MD; Bass PD; Belk KE Meat Sci; 2010 Jul; 85(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 20416803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The availability and cost of healthier food alternatives. Jetter KM; Cassady DL Am J Prev Med; 2006 Jan; 30(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 16414422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The role of meat in everyday food culture: an analysis of an interview study in Copenhagen. Holm L; Møhl M Appetite; 2000 Jun; 34(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 10888291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cheese liking and consumer willingness to pay as affected by information about organic production. Napolitano F; Braghieri A; Piasentier E; Favotto S; Naspetti S; Zanoli R J Dairy Res; 2010 Aug; 77(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 20196900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market. Kelly B; Hughes C; Chapman K; Louie JC; Dixon H; Crawford J; King L; Daube M; Slevin T Health Promot Int; 2009 Jun; 24(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 19336501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Egg substitutes: use and preference--with and without nutritional information. Ostrander J; Martinsen C; McCullough J; Childs M J Am Diet Assoc; 1977 Mar; 70(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 839035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Identification of the characteristics that drive consumer liking of butter. Krause AJ; Lopetcharat K; Drake MA J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2091-102. PubMed ID: 17430906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Exposure, health information and flavour-masking strategies for improving the sensory quality of probiotic juice. Luckow T; Sheehan V; Fitzgerald G; Delahunty C Appetite; 2006 Nov; 47(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 16857295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Meat packaging, preservation, and marketing implications: Consumer preferences in an emerging economy. Wang HH; Chen J; Bai J; Lai J Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():300-307. PubMed ID: 30007176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A survey of Mexican retail chain stores for fresh U.S. pork. Huerta-Leidenz N; Howard ST; Ruíz Flores A; Ngapo TM; Belk KE Meat Sci; 2016 Sep; 119():165-73. PubMed ID: 27206052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Consumer preferences for the color of unprocessed animal foods. Altmann BA; Trinks A; Mörlein D J Food Sci; 2023 Mar; 88(3):909-925. PubMed ID: 36727664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effects of supplemental manganese on performance of growing-finishing pigs and pork quality during retail display. Sawyer JT; Tittor AW; Apple JK; Morgan JB; Maxwell CV; Rakes LK; Fakler TM J Anim Sci; 2007 Apr; 85(4):1046-53. PubMed ID: 17178808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of packaging atmospheres on beef instrumental tenderness, fresh color stability, and internal cooked color. Grobbel JP; Dikeman ME; Hunt MC; Milliken GA J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1191-9. PubMed ID: 18245502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Australian consumers are sceptical about but influenced by claims about fat on food labels. Chan C; Patch C; Williams P Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Jan; 59(1):148-51. PubMed ID: 15305180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts. Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Drivers of liking for yogurt drinks with prebiotics and probiotics. Allgeyer LC; Miller MJ; Lee SY J Food Sci; 2010 May; 75(4):S212-9. PubMed ID: 20546424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Influences on food choice perceived to be important by nationally-representative samples of adults in the European Union. Lennernäs M; Fjellström C; Becker W; Giachetti I; Schmitt A; Remaut de Winter A; Kearney M Eur J Clin Nutr; 1997 Jun; 51 Suppl 2():S8-15. PubMed ID: 9222718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Consumer acceptability of ground venison. Brittin HC; Armes CL; Ramsey CB; Simpson CD J Am Diet Assoc; 1982 Jun; 80(6):557-60. PubMed ID: 7086008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Consumers' quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef. Banović M; Grunert KG; Barreira MM; Fontes MA Meat Sci; 2010 Jan; 84(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20374754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios. Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]