These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20417275)

  • 1. An investigation into the role of mucus thickness on mucoadhesion in the gastrointestinal tract of pig.
    Varum FJ; Veiga F; Sousa JS; Basit AW
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2010 Jul; 40(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 20417275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mucus thickness in the gastrointestinal tract of laboratory animals.
    Varum FJ; Veiga F; Sousa JS; Basit AW
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 64(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 22221097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The adherent gastrointestinal mucus gel layer: thickness and physical state in vivo.
    Atuma C; Strugala V; Allen A; Holm L
    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2001 May; 280(5):G922-9. PubMed ID: 11292601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mucus gel thickness and turnover in the gastrointestinal tract of the rat: response to cholinergic stimulus and implication for mucoadhesion.
    Rubinstein A; Tirosh B
    Pharm Res; 1994 Jun; 11(6):794-9. PubMed ID: 7937516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The thickness of the mucus layer in different segments of the rat intestine.
    Szentkuti L; Lorenz K
    Histochem J; 1995 Jun; 27(6):466-72. PubMed ID: 7558896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of nanoparticle permeation on the bulk rheological properties of mucus from the small intestine.
    Wilcox MD; Van Rooij LK; Chater PI; Pereira de Sousa I; Pearson JP
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2015 Oct; 96():484-7. PubMed ID: 25758122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of mucus thickness and production in situ.
    Holm L; Phillipson M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 842():217-27. PubMed ID: 22259138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mucoadhesion and the gastrointestinal tract.
    Varum FJ; McConnell EL; Sousa JJ; Veiga F; Basit AW
    Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst; 2008; 25(3):207-58. PubMed ID: 18540839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of physicochemical and biological parameters on drug release from microspheres adhered on vesical and intestinal mucosa.
    Bogataj M; Mrhar A; Korosec L
    Int J Pharm; 1999 Jan; 177(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 10205615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mucin/poly(acrylic acid) interactions: a spectroscopic investigation of mucoadhesion.
    Patel MM; Smart JD; Nevell TG; Ewen RJ; Eaton PJ; Tsibouklis J
    Biomacromolecules; 2003; 4(5):1184-90. PubMed ID: 12959582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of mucus and its components in protection and repair within the alimentary tract mucosa: Polish experience.
    Gindzienski A; Zwierz K; Sarosiek J
    J Physiol Pharmacol; 2003 Dec; 54 Suppl 3():127-44. PubMed ID: 15075468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A rheological assessment of the nature of interactions between mucoadhesive polymers and a homogenised mucus gel.
    Madsen F; Eberth K; Smart JD
    Biomaterials; 1998 Jun; 19(11-12):1083-92. PubMed ID: 9692807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mucoadhesive vs. mucopenetrating particulate drug delivery.
    Netsomboon K; Bernkop-Schnürch A
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2016 Jan; 98():76-89. PubMed ID: 26598207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of mucoadhesion by a resonant mirror biosensor.
    Sigurdsson HH; Loftsson T; Lehr CM
    Int J Pharm; 2006 Nov; 325(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 16904852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical modelling of the rheological and mucoadhesive properties of aqueous poly(methylvinylether-co-maleic acid) networks: Redefining biomedical applications and the relationship between viscoelasticity and mucoadhesion.
    Jones DS; Laverty TP; Morris C; Andrews GP
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2016 Aug; 144():125-134. PubMed ID: 27085044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distribution of thiolated mucoadhesive nanoparticles on intestinal mucosa.
    Dünnhaupt S; Barthelmes J; Hombach J; Sakloetsakun D; Arkhipova V; Bernkop-Schnürch A
    Int J Pharm; 2011 Apr; 408(1-2):191-9. PubMed ID: 21295123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanisms of mucoadhesion of poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels.
    Park H; Robinson JR
    Pharm Res; 1987 Dec; 4(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 3508557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of surface chemistry on nanoparticle interaction with gastrointestinal mucus and distribution in the gastrointestinal tract following oral and rectal administration in the mouse.
    Maisel K; Ensign L; Reddy M; Cone R; Hanes J
    J Control Release; 2015 Jan; 197():48-57. PubMed ID: 25449804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The correlation between zeta potential and mucoadhesion strength on pig vesical mucosa.
    Bogataj M; Vovk T; Kerec M; Dimnik A; Grabnar I; Mrhar A
    Biol Pharm Bull; 2003 May; 26(5):743-6. PubMed ID: 12736526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covalently binding mucoadhesive polymers: N-hydroxysuccinimide grafted polyacrylates.
    Menzel C; Hauser M; Frey A; Jelkmann M; Laffleur F; Götzfried SK; Gust R; Bernkop-Schnürch A
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2019 Jun; 139():161-167. PubMed ID: 30898541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.