483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20417752)
1. Twenty-five year experience with the St. Jude medical mechanical valve prosthesis.
Toole JM; Stroud MR; Kratz JM; Crumbley AJ; Bradley SM; Crawford FA; Ikonomidis JS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1402-9. PubMed ID: 20417752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Twenty-year experience with the St Jude Medical mechanical valve prosthesis.
Ikonomidis JS; Kratz JM; Crumbley AJ; Stroud MR; Bradley SM; Sade RM; Crawford FA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 126(6):2022-31. PubMed ID: 14688722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: ten-year follow-up.
Bryan AJ; Rogers CA; Bayliss K; Wild J; Angelini GD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 133(3):614-22. PubMed ID: 17320553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
McClure RS; Narayanasamy N; Wiegerinck E; Lipsitz S; Maloney A; Byrne JG; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Cohn LH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; McAdams S; Emery AM; Holter AR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 20845896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes with the epicholorohydrin-modified porcine aortic heart valve: a 15-year follow-up.
Wei X; Yi W; Chen W; Ma X; Lau WB; Wang H; Yi D
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1417-24. PubMed ID: 20417754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Six-and-half years' experience with the St. Jude BioImplant porcine prosthesis.
Triggiani M; D'Ancona G; Nascimbene S; Benussi S; Donatelli F; Paolini G; Galli L; Grossi A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Mar; 6(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 9130121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prosthesis: a 25-year experience with single valve replacement.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; Arom KV; Emery AM; Benyo-Albrecht K; Joyce LD; Nicoloff DM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 79(3):776-82; discussion 782-3. PubMed ID: 15734375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of the carbomedics prosthesis: experience at providence health system in Portland.
Minakata K; Wu Y; Zerr KJ; Grunkemeier GL; Handy JR; Ahmad A; Starr A; Furnary AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):844-50. PubMed ID: 12479287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; Jones DJ; Nicoloff DM; Blake DP; Arom KV
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 15086262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
