These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2041866)

  • 1. [The implantation of Hickman catheters. A new function of interventional radiology].
    Rau WS; Rauber K; Weimar B; Pralle H
    Radiologe; 1991 Mar; 31(3):125-31. PubMed ID: 2041866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
    Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
    Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Insertion of Hickman catheters in an interventional radiology suite].
    Konen E; Garniak A; Morag B; Hardan I; Rubinstein Z
    Harefuah; 1997 Apr; 132(7):454-7, 528, 527. PubMed ID: 9153910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiologic placement of Hickman catheters.
    Robertson LJ; Mauro MA; Jaques PF
    Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 2):1007-9. PubMed ID: 2916052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insertion of Hickman catheters. A comparison of cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
    Davis SJ; Thompson JS; Edney JA
    Am Surg; 1984 Dec; 50(12):673-6. PubMed ID: 6508024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Avoiding complications of long-term venous access.
    Henriques HF; Karmy-Jones R; Knoll SM; Copes WS; Giordano JM
    Am Surg; 1993 Sep; 59(9):555-8. PubMed ID: 8368659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insertion of Hickman catheters by the percutaneous technique.
    Teh A; Leong KW
    Med J Malaysia; 1995 Dec; 50(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 8668056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Long term central venous catheterization revisited].
    Palermo S; Campolucci A; Capozza F; Cammardella MP; Balestrero A; Ferrando F; Basta P; Launo C
    Minerva Anestesiol; 1995 Nov; 61(11):451-6. PubMed ID: 8677035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].
    Albo López C; López Rodríguez D; Constenla Camba MI; Jimenéz Blanco A; Araujo LF; García-Medina J
    Sangre (Barc); 1999 Jun; 44(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10481577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thrombotic complications of silicone rubber catheters during autologous marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation: prospective comparison of Hickman and Groshong catheters.
    Haire WD; Lieberman RP; Lund GB; Edney JA; Kessinger A; Armitage JO
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1991 Jan; 7(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 1675136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Low-risk alternatives for ongoing venous access.
    Merrell SW; Peatross BG; Grossman MD; Sullivan JJ; Harker WG
    West J Med; 1994 Jan; 160(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8128698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fate of 100 prolonged venous access devices.
    Hayward SR; Ledgerwood AM; Lucas CE
    Am Surg; 1990 Sep; 56(9):515-9. PubMed ID: 2393188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Percutaneous insertion of subclavian Hickman catheters.
    Morton JE; Jan-Mohamed RM; Barker HF; Milligan DW
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1991 Jan; 7(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 2043876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The natural history of tunneled hemodialysis catheters removed or exchanged: a single-institution experience.
    Alomari AI; Falk A
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 17327555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Externalized Groshong catheters and Hickman ports for central venous access in gynecologic oncology patients.
    Gleeson NC; Fiorica JV; Mark JE; Pinelli DM; Hoffman MS; Roberts WS; Cavanagh D
    Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Dec; 51(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 8112648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
    Lorch H; Zwaan M; Kagel C; Weiss HD
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
    Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized, prospective trial of standard Hickman compared with Groshong central venous catheters in pediatric oncology patients.
    Warner BW; Haygood MM; Davies SL; Hennies GA
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Aug; 183(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 8696545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Central venous access: our experience with Hickman and Broviac catheter in children].
    Milanović D; Krstić Z; Vukadinović V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1994; 122(5-6):189-91. PubMed ID: 17977427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do AshSplit haemodialysis catheters provide better flow rates in the long term?
    Keeling AN; O'Dwyer H; Lyon S; O'Kelly P; McGrath FP; Conlon PJ; Lee MJ
    Ren Fail; 2007; 29(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 17763168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.