BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20418771)

  • 1. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.
    He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 20418771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 21730858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suitability of the Binaural Interaction Component for Interaural Electrode Pairing of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():57-64. PubMed ID: 27080646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Kirby B; Brown C; Abbas P; Etler C; O'Brien S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 22246138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Smith ZM; Delgutte B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):134-51. PubMed ID: 17225976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Long CJ; Eddington DK; Colburn HS; Rabinowitz WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1565-74. PubMed ID: 14514210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.
    Sammeth CA; Greene NT; Brown AD; Tollin DJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):629-643. PubMed ID: 33141776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electric auditory brain-stem responses in nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Hodges AV; Ruth RA; Lambert PR; Balkany TJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Oct; 120(10):1093-9. PubMed ID: 7917192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
    Truy E; Gallego S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Morgon A
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):554-9. PubMed ID: 9546269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
    Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Deniz B; Kara E; Polat Z; Deniz R; Ataş A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 141():110555. PubMed ID: 33333339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.
    Brown AD; Anbuhl KL; Gilmer JI; Tollin DJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep; 122(3):1110-1122. PubMed ID: 31314646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaural frequency mismatch jointly modulates neural brainstem binaural interaction and behavioral interaural time difference sensitivity in humans.
    Sammeth CA; Brown AD; Greene NT; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 437():108839. PubMed ID: 37429100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing with Two Ears: Evidence for Cortical Binaural Interaction during Auditory Processing.
    Henkin Y; Yaar-Soffer Y; Givon L; Hildesheimer M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):384-92. PubMed ID: 25879242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.