These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20419082)

  • 1. ON THE SINGLE-MASS MODEL OF THE VOCAL FOLDS.
    Howe MS; McGowan RS
    Fluid Dyn Res; 2010 Jan; 42(1):15001. PubMed ID: 20419082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ANALYSIS OF FLOW-STRUCTURE COUPLING IN A MECHANICAL MODEL OF THE VOCAL FOLDS AND THE SUBGLOTTAL SYSTEM.
    Howe MS; McGowan RS
    J Fluids Struct; 2009 Nov; 25(8):1299-1317. PubMed ID: 20161450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the aerodynamic sound of speech through static vocal tract models of various glottal shapes.
    Schickhofer L; Mihaescu M
    J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 99():109484. PubMed ID: 31761432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the ventricular folds on a voice source with specified vocal fold motion.
    McGowan RS; Howe MS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1519-27. PubMed ID: 20329852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrative Insights into the Myoelastic-Aerodynamic Theory and Acoustics of Phonation. Scientific Tribute to Donald G. Miller.
    Švec JG; Schutte HK; Chen CJ; Titze IR
    J Voice; 2023 May; 37(3):305-313. PubMed ID: 33744068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental study on the quasi-steady approximation of glottal flows.
    Honda T; Kanaya M; Tokuda IT; Bouvet A; Van Hirtum A; Pelorson X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 May; 151(5):3129. PubMed ID: 35649918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulation of glottal closure and airflow in a three-dimensional phonation model: implications for vocal intensity control.
    Zhang Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):898-910. PubMed ID: 25698022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glottal Adduction and Subglottal Pressure in Singing.
    Herbst CT; Hess M; Müller F; Švec JG; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 25944295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ON THE GENERALISED FANT EQUATION.
    Howe MS; McGowan RS
    J Sound Vib; 2011 Jun; 330(13):3123-3140. PubMed ID: 21603054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraglottal Pressure: A Comparison Between Male and Female Larynxes.
    Li S; Scherer RC; Wan M; Wang S; Song B
    J Voice; 2020 Nov; 34(6):813-822. PubMed ID: 31311664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of False Vocal Folds on Intraglottal Velocity Fields.
    Oren L; Khosla S; Farbos de Luzan C; Gutmark E
    J Voice; 2021 Sep; 35(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 32147314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time-Dependent Pressure and Flow Behavior of a Self-oscillating Laryngeal Model With Ventricular Folds.
    Alipour F; Scherer RC
    J Voice; 2015 Nov; 29(6):649-59. PubMed ID: 25873541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On subglottal formant analysis.
    Cranen B; Boves L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):734-46. PubMed ID: 3584682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A computational study of the effect of false vocal folds on glottal flow and vocal fold vibration during phonation.
    Zheng X; Bielamowicz S; Luo H; Mittal R
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 37(3):625-42. PubMed ID: 19142730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glottal flow through a two-mass model: comparison of Navier-Stokes solutions with simplified models.
    de Vries MP; Schutte HK; Veldman AE; Verkerke GJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1847-53. PubMed ID: 12002868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of glottal open regions by exploiting changes in the vocal tract system characteristics.
    Prasad RS; Yegnanarayana B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):666. PubMed ID: 27475188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indirect assessment of the contribution of subglottal air pressure and vocal-fold tension to changes of fundamental frequency in English.
    Monsen RB; Engebretson AM; Vemula NR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jul; 64(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 712003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subglottal Impedance-Based Inverse Filtering of Voiced Sounds Using Neck Surface Acceleration.
    Zañartu M; Ho JC; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Wodicka GR
    IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2013 Sep; 21(9):1929-1939. PubMed ID: 25400531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimized transformation of the glottal motion into a mechanical model.
    Triep M; Brücker C; Stingl M; Döllinger M
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Mar; 33(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 21115384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of the Intraglottal Pressure Induced by Flow Separation Vortices Using Large Eddy Simulation.
    Farbos de Luzan C; Oren L; Gutmark E; Khosla SM
    J Voice; 2021 Nov; 35(6):822-831. PubMed ID: 32273211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.