Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20419616)

  • 1. Suitability of semi-automated tumor response assessment of liver metastases using a dedicated software package.
    Kalkmann J; Ladd SC; de Greiff A; Forsting M; Stattaus J
    Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 20419616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semi-automatic software increases CT measurement accuracy but not response classification of colorectal liver metastases after chemotherapy.
    van Kessel CS; van Leeuwen MS; Witteveen PO; Kwee TC; Verkooijen HM; van Hillegersberg R
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2543-9. PubMed ID: 22264447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with conventional and antiangiogenetic chemotherapy: evaluation with liver computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Cartocci G; Saba L; Menichini G; Cavallo Marincola B; Marotta E; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(6):690-6. PubMed ID: 22082538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of kernels used for the reconstruction of MDCT datasets on the semi-automated segmentation and volumetry of liver lesions.
    Pinto dos Santos D; Kloeckner R; Wunder K; Bornemann L; Düber C; Mildenberger P
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):780-4. PubMed ID: 24458377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response Evaluation of Malignant Liver Lesions After TACE/SIRT: Comparison of Manual and Semi-Automatic Measurement of Different Response Criteria in Multislice CT.
    Höink AJ; Schülke C; Koch R; Löhnert A; Kammerer S; Fortkamp R; Heindel W; Buerke B
    Rofo; 2017 Nov; 189(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 28834965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RECIST and WHO criteria evaluation of cervical, thoracic and abdominal lymph nodes in patients with malignant lymphoma: manual versus semi-automated measurement on standard MDCT slices.
    Keil S; Behrendt FF; Stanzel S; Suehling M; Jost E; Mühlenbruch G; Mahnken A; Günther RW; Das M
    Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):888-95. PubMed ID: 19582654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases-software-assisted evaluation of the ablation zone in MDCT: tumor-free follow-up versus local recurrent disease.
    Keil S; Bruners P; Schiffl K; Sedlmair M; Mühlenbruch G; Günther RW; Das M; Mahnken AH
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Apr; 33(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 19688366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Volume measurement of liver metastases using multidetector computed tomography: comparison of lesion diameter and volume segmentation - a phantom study.
    Rothe JH; Steffen IG; Lehmkuhl L; Grieser C; Mussler A; Schnapauff D; Stelter L; Denecke T
    Rofo; 2010 Dec; 182(12):1082-90. PubMed ID: 21104596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of slice thickness on semi-automated measurements for volume and whole-tumor attenuation of colorectal hepatic metastases in multislice computed tomography.
    Rao SX; Meng T; Zhang LJ; Zeng MS
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):863-8. PubMed ID: 23761557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semiautomated versus manual evaluation of liver metastases treated by radiofrequency ablation.
    Keil S; Bruners P; Ohnsorge L; Plumhans C; Behrendt FF; Stanzel S; Sühling M; Günther RW; Das M; Mahnken AH
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 20123208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided detection (CAD) and assessment of malignant lesions in the liver and lung using a novel PET/CT software tool: initial results.
    Hahn S; Heusner T; Zhou X; Zhan Y; Peng Z; Hamami M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
    Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 19859858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hepatic tumors: region-of-interest versus volumetric analysis for quantification of attenuation at CT.
    Chalian H; Tochetto SM; Töre HG; Rezai P; Yaghmai V
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):853-61. PubMed ID: 22357887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liver lesion segmentation in MSCT: effect of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision and interobserver variability.
    Puesken M; Buerke B; Fortkamp R; Koch R; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Wessling J
    Rofo; 2011 Apr; 183(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 21246480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated software supported versus manual aorto-iliac diameter measurements in CT angiography of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation.
    Diehm N; Baumgartner I; Silvestro A; Herrmann P; Triller J; Schmidli J; Do DD; Dinkel HP
    Vasa; 2005 Nov; 34(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16363281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response evaluation in patients with colorectal liver metastases: RECIST version 1.1 versus modified CT criteria.
    Chung WS; Park MS; Shin SJ; Baek SE; Kim YE; Choi JY; Kim MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 22997372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver agreement of semi-automated and manual measurements of functional MRI metrics of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Bonekamp D; Bonekamp S; Halappa VG; Geschwind JF; Eng J; Corona-Villalobos CP; Pawlik TM; Kamel IR
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 24387824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lung, liver and lymph node metastases in follow-up MSCT: comprehensive volumetric assessment of lesion size changes.
    Wulff AM; Bolte H; Fischer S; Freitag-Wolf S; Soza G; Tietjen C; Biederer J; Heller M; Fabel M
    Rofo; 2012 Sep; 184(9):820-8. PubMed ID: 22872601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semi-automated measurement of hyperdense, hypodense and heterogeneous hepatic metastasis on standard MDCT slices. Comparison of semi-automated and manual measurement of RECIST and WHO criteria.
    Keil S; Behrendt FF; Stanzel S; Sühling M; Koch A; Bubenzer J; Mühlenbruch G; Mahnken AH; Günther RW; Das M
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Nov; 18(11):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18523775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative radiology assessment of tumor response: does it measure up?
    Gottlieb RH; Litwin A; Gupta B; Taylor J; Raczyk C; Mashtare T; Wilding G; Fakih M
    Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 18313578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linear and volume measurements of pulmonary nodules at different CT dose levels - intrascan and interscan analysis.
    Hein PA; Romano VC; Rogalla P; Klessen C; Lembcke A; Dicken V; Bornemann L; Bauknecht HC
    Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 19085687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.