These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2041972)

  • 1. [Influence of cavity preparation on mechanical resistance of teeth].
    Lopes LM; Leitão JG; Douglas WH
    Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1991; 31(4):207-13. PubMed ID: 2041972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mechanical resistance of endodontically treated upper first premolar crowns].
    Marcoli PA; Pasini S; Visconti L; Bellagamba F
    G Ital Endod; 1991; 5(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 1782437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
    de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review.
    Fernandes AS; Dessai GS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 11508092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations.
    Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of various cavity design, lining and restorative materials on the fracture resistance of teeth].
    Zhan F; Zhao M; Li Z
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Jan; 36(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11812303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures.
    Reeh ES; Messer HH; Douglas WH
    J Endod; 1989 Nov; 15(11):512-6. PubMed ID: 2639947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On material choice and fracture susceptibility of restored teeth: an asymptotic stress analysis approach.
    Kahler B; Kotousov A; Melkoumian N
    Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1109-14. PubMed ID: 16375962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamometric assessment of the mechanical resistance of porcelain veneers related to tooth preparation: a comparison between two techniques.
    Zarone F; Epifania E; Leone G; Sorrentino R; Ferrari M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 May; 95(5):354-63. PubMed ID: 16679130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of designs of Class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture.
    Blaser PK; Lund MR; Cochran MA; Potter RH
    Oper Dent; 1983; 8(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6574432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance in conservative Class II cavity preparation: box vs tunnel.
    Khairy MA
    Egypt Dent J; 1994 Jul; 40(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 9588153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth.
    Torbjörner A; Fransson B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 15237888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.