These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution. Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of various cavity design, lining and restorative materials on the fracture resistance of teeth]. Zhan F; Zhao M; Li Z Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Jan; 36(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11812303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. Reeh ES; Messer HH; Douglas WH J Endod; 1989 Nov; 15(11):512-6. PubMed ID: 2639947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On material choice and fracture susceptibility of restored teeth: an asymptotic stress analysis approach. Kahler B; Kotousov A; Melkoumian N Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1109-14. PubMed ID: 16375962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamometric assessment of the mechanical resistance of porcelain veneers related to tooth preparation: a comparison between two techniques. Zarone F; Epifania E; Leone G; Sorrentino R; Ferrari M J Prosthet Dent; 2006 May; 95(5):354-63. PubMed ID: 16679130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of designs of Class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture. Blaser PK; Lund MR; Cochran MA; Potter RH Oper Dent; 1983; 8(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6574432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance in conservative Class II cavity preparation: box vs tunnel. Khairy MA Egypt Dent J; 1994 Jul; 40(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 9588153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth. Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Torbjörner A; Fransson B Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 15237888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]