These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20422970)

  • 21. Informed consent, a legal requirement in the management of patients with epilepsy.
    Beran RG
    Med Law; 2003; 22(1):155-84. PubMed ID: 12809349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Health care worker's legal duty to disclose HIV-positive status to patients before performing invasive procedures.
    Brinkley PD
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1995 Mar; (193):9-28. PubMed ID: 10160578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is "informed consent" a deceptive notion with negligible protection value for doctors?
    Berney CR
    ANZ J Surg; 2013 Apr; 83(4):201-2. PubMed ID: 23675600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nothing to fear but fear itself: HIV-infected physicians and the law of informed consent.
    De Ville KA
    J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(2):163-75, discussion 176-8. PubMed ID: 7921084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The rebirth of informed consent: a cultural analysis of the Informed Consent Doctrine after Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin.
    Ketler SK
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2001; 95(3):1029-56. PubMed ID: 12778922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Duty to warn third parties: Bradshaw v. Daniel.
    Kennedy I
    Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 12159832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The trouble with paediatricians.
    Williams C
    Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):389-416. PubMed ID: 20739437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hospital must notify patient if it suspects HIV infection.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Apr; 11(6):3. PubMed ID: 11363279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genomic torts: the law of the future -- the duty of physicians to disclose the presence of a genetic disease to the relatives of their patients with the disease.
    Deftos LJ
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1997; 32(1):105-37. PubMed ID: 11660530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Confidentiality and the "dangerous" patient: implications of Tarasoff for psychiatrists and lawyers.
    Merton V
    Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):263-343. PubMed ID: 11653483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapist's obligation of confidentiality versus the duty to warn.
    Nesbitt NA
    Tulsa Law J; 1977; 12(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 11661722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The balance between patient-doctor confidentiality and the public good.
    Pannell SM; Elliott RL
    J Med Assoc Ga; 2010; 99(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 20465053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Status of the emergency room psychotherapist: privacy rites.
    Heimberg SA
    UCLA Law Rev; 1983 Aug; 30(6):1316-48. PubMed ID: 11649584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. California expands the duty to warn patients exposed to and infected with HIV. Reisner v. Regents of the University of California.
    Ferguson RT; Ruehmann SC
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1995 Jun; 10(6):5-7. PubMed ID: 10184366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Informed consent: physician inexperience is a material risk for patients.
    Veerapen RJ
    J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(3):478-85. PubMed ID: 17714257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians.
    Bobinski MA
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Expanding the boundaries of informed consent: disclosing alcoholism and HIV status to patients.
    Spielman B
    Am J Med; 1992 Aug; 93(2):216-8. PubMed ID: 1497019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The performance of invasive procedures by HIV-infected doctors: the duty to disclose under the informed consent doctrine.
    DeBarge MW
    Conn Law Rev; 1993; 25(3):991-1025. PubMed ID: 11659692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Obligations of HIV-infected health professionals to inform patients of their serological status: evolving theories of liability.
    LeBlang TR
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 27(2):317-30. PubMed ID: 11654695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Disclosure of HIV status--a surgeon's responsibility?
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1993 Oct; 10(12):1-5. PubMed ID: 10128406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.